Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I am trying to solve a problem. A nearly identical question was asked in 2009. The answer at that time was "It can't be done". But three years later is that still the case? I don't know.

So, I sort of re-posted the question (see above link), but with a slightly different slant (no Javascript in answer please). But not different enough to keep it from being considered a duplicate.

My other option would be to post a bounty on the old question. But should I really have to do that? I mean, is that what one needs to do to get up to date info? Spend rep? (I actually don't care much about my rep, but I could easily have to spend all my paltry 500 points just trying to get up to date answers.)

share|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

A good question. My opinion would be: create a new question only if you know things have changed.

If you have made some research, and have reasonable doubts that the situation have changed (e.g. something was impossible 3 years ago, but became possible because of new software or other reasons), then I believe it's ok to ask again. You must, however, include your reaserch attempts and your reasons for asking it again, simply because people need to know that it's not exactly a duplicate, but a similar question with new conditions.

A bounty is rather a tool to atract attention to a question that has not yet recieved a solution. In your case, it's a different story. The solution was found 3 years ago, and it was "that can't be done".

share|improve this answer
1  
Thanks for your reply. I did do research, but to be honest, I don't know for sure that things have changed. What I do know is that 3 years is an eternity in IT, and whenever I give an answer based on information that is three years old, I always say "But it's probably changed since then". – John Fitzpatrick Sep 14 '12 at 7:23
    
This is my comment. it might be hard to know whether things have changed. In this case is there a protocol to follow? – Paul Nov 18 '13 at 14:56

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .