Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Currently I see three tags , and . I propose these to be merged to .

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by CRABOLO, gnat, Martijn Pieters, Doorknob, rene Jan 13 '15 at 21:54

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – CRABOLO, gnat, Martijn Pieters, Doorknob, rene
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

This tag is way too ambiguous; it should just be burned, all of them. Just browsing through the already incredibly short list of questions, I'm seeing it being used for JSP, Java, Struts, ColdFusion, Ruby on Rails, and HTML. Though the only tag wiki (on ) seems to indicate the tag is strictly for JSP. I don't really see it adding any value to the questions it is on.

share|improve this answer
I disagree; while the questions about ruby and html just address the parsing of custom tags, those addressing jsp, java and struts target a very precise java technology. – guido Feb 11 '13 at 2:32
@guido: Then they need a different tag. That doesn't make the current tag any less ambiguous. – animuson Feb 11 '13 at 2:35
yes that's what I mean, the customtags tag should be used, as told in its description, just on java/jsp questions (and synonyms merged). Should be replaced with something more generic (ie: parsing) elsewhere. – guido Feb 11 '13 at 2:38
That doesn't eliminate the problem of people continuing to use the tag. The term "custom tags" may mean something specific in JSP, but the phrase "custom tags" means a larger variety of things across many other languages. If you really need a custom-tags tag, then it should be somehow JSP-specific if it only applies to JSP questions. Not even half the questions tagged with these appear to be related to JSP. Django does this with django-custom-tags. – animuson Feb 11 '13 at 2:44
Out of java/jsp context, we can consider custom-tags easily as general as "tag-based meta language"; while in-context, we can consider java as a superset of jsp, and jsp as a superset of the (jsp) custom-tags questions. Unfortunately custom tags is a very bad name for this technology but nevertheless is how the developers commonly refer to that. Maybe jsp-tag-library would be better? For sure, but I doubt people would use it – guido Feb 11 '13 at 2:54

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .