Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

When you display the vote-count of a post and mouseover, a tool tip like this is shown:

+ 84 up / -86 down

While it's clear that "-86 down" is referring to the number of downvotes, wouldn't it be more straightforward to have the tooltip say "84 up / 86 down" without the plus and minus signs? Especially with so many sites geared toward people who are used to a double negative meaning positive (which would mean an overall score of 170 in this example). Minus eighty-six down just doesn't make sense. Plus eighty-four up is correct, but partially redundant.

share|improve this question
17  
Why do we even need a tooltip there, period? Is it not already clear from the text that it's +84 and -86? – animuson Sep 20 '12 at 0:00
2  
@animuson: Perhaps it's better in terms of accessibility? – doncherry Sep 20 '12 at 0:05
3  
Thanks for the downvote, now we can actually see what I'm describing in this very question ;) – doncherry Sep 20 '12 at 0:18
3  
I'd actually be happy if they put the +84 / -86 in a tooltip on the total, pre-expanded number, instead of making me click to request the vote counts every time. I agree that "-86 down" is redundant, but I wouldn't necessarily advocate going into the code just to fix that. – Aaron Bertrand Sep 20 '12 at 0:53
    
@AaronBertrand It's the little fixes that matter. – user184498 Sep 20 '12 at 1:15
1  
@BryanDunsmore sure, but not when you fix a bunch of little things in lieu of fixing something bigger and more important. – Aaron Bertrand Sep 20 '12 at 1:20
    
@AaronBertrand Absolutely. But there really isn't anything big or important going on right now... – user184498 Sep 20 '12 at 1:35
    
@AaronBertrand: But that's not for me to judge, having no clue what's going on inside the SE machinery. I have no idea if such a fix would take five minutes or five hours. If the devs decide this isn't high priority right now, it'll be a status-deferred. – doncherry Sep 20 '12 at 1:38
    
@BryanDunsmore you don't think there are any valid feature requests on meta that haven't been set to status-declined or status-completed? – Aaron Bertrand Sep 20 '12 at 1:38
    
@doncherry I wasn't saying your request doesn't make sense, in fact I was agreeing with you. However, I don't think it's important enough to go out of their way to fix. If they're in that part of the code fixing something else, great, but like I said I'd rather they change it so that I can see the vote breakdown without having to click... – Aaron Bertrand Sep 20 '12 at 1:40
    
@AaronBertrand Apparently, showing the split count without requiring a click would take a much greater effort. – bfavaretto Sep 20 '12 at 2:06
    
@bfavaretto yeah I don't get that. I understand the database was not designed to optimize that specific query, but there's a fix for that. Even with the bad design I wonder if they're really saving database requests overall - they don't have to run them on page load but they have to run them when I click. Granted I'm not doing that for every answer on a page, but I might do it on my own or on a specific answer every time I load the page. – Aaron Bertrand Sep 20 '12 at 2:11
    
@AaronBertrand I guess you're right, they probably just don't want to change that aspect of the db, who knows why. – bfavaretto Sep 20 '12 at 2:55
    
I agree, it would be better if it would say +2. – Marko Sep 28 '12 at 1:24
up vote 9 down vote accepted

The next build will remove the + & - on the title for that element.

They're that way in the first place as a consequence of some code re-use, I agree that they're redundant and possibly confusing.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .