Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Example: In Seattle, the returns are greatly dominated by Amazon and I'd personally rather not work for them.

share|improve this question
Curious why you would not want to work for them (just wondering if you've worked there before)? I just got contacted by them for a second interview. – JonH Sep 20 '12 at 15:06
Suffice it to say there are good reasons why they do so much out-of-area recruiting. – Jeffrey Katcher Sep 20 '12 at 17:24
I guess I don't understand what you mean? Do you mean they recruit outside of seattle because half of seattle has worked for them? Is it just not a good place to work? – JonH Sep 20 '12 at 17:35
Not much fun in Stalingrad, to quote the Monty Python sketch. – Jeffrey Katcher Sep 20 '12 at 18:14
Here's another use case: A user may not want to see job postings from the company that just laid them off. – KatieK Oct 17 '12 at 20:10

I was about to say "suck it up and just ignore them" but I kinda see your point when doing a search in Seattle.

Maybe Careers could allow negative keywords like -Amazon in the "what" section? If those are then applied to the company name, this could be implemented without having to actually add a "exclude employer" feature. Of course, it would have to be made discoverable somehow.

share|improve this answer
I'd prefer the exclusion of specific employers. "-Name" might exclude things you don't want to exclude. – S.L. Barth Sep 20 '12 at 10:25

We’ve added a negative search, per Pekka’s suggestion. Here is a link for non-Amazon jobs near Seattle – note the syntax.

It’s a negative keyword search, so it doesn’t strictly look at employers. If a job listing mentions Amazon (say in the context of AWS), then it’ll likely be excluded as well.

share|improve this answer
S.L.Barth's counter-point to my suggestion has merit, but I guess this is a step in the right direction, and helps in extreme situations like the one the OP is in! – Pëkka Oct 17 '12 at 19:38
From 104 down to 40, which is a great help in filtering out the chaff! – Jeffrey Katcher Oct 19 '12 at 22:27
Is there a negative search by location? Pretty please I need this. I'm looking for a job that is NOT in the US and it's a lot more chaff. It looks like half the jobs come out of there. I literally go through each of the many pages sifting through the results. – gideon Nov 6 '13 at 13:45
Seems like putting -usa into what worked. – gideon Nov 6 '13 at 13:57
This worked for a long time, but it recently became broken. '0 job for "-amazon" near Seattle, WA' – David Grant Nov 20 '13 at 15:53

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .