Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I don't flag overly much these days, but I just had a flag declined with "We should learn to love duplicates."(!?!)

The reason seems like a bizarre non sequitur to me. Personally, I already "love" good duplicates for their SEO value (they should still be closed), but I hate poor duplicates that clutter up the site and make it harder to find the good stuff (they should be closed and deleted).

The question is a text-book duplicate, even the flag-decliner tacitly admitted it was a duplicate!

So, Is this a new policy, or a moderator hiccup?


I stumbled across this question, and noticed:

  1. It was a very generic question, surely it had been asked before.

  2. Sure enough, it was flagged as a duplicate 4 minutes after the Q was opened:

    possible duplicate of Can I use multiple versions of jQuery on the same page? – a'r Sep 23 '11 at 11:27

  3. Comparing the two sets of questions and answers, they were about as duplicate as it ever gets.

  4. The OP admitted it was a duplicate!

    Yep, it's a duplicate. Sorry for that! – Randomblue Sep 23 '11 at 11:27

  5. The guy that wrote the only answer recommended the duplicate:

    Please see the comment from a'r. I's a much better solution. (It was posted while I wrote my answer) – Jonas Stensved Sep 23 '11 at 11:30

So here was a question which was a textbook, cut-and dried duplicate, and both the OP and the answerer admitted it!
But, it had now been a year and the question had managed to get 103 views (when I first saw it a few hours ago). So, it had slipped through the normal close-vote process as low-view questions often do.

I did what I always do with such questions:

  1. Vote to close.
  2. Also flag it, since it had evaded the normal close-process only via stealth (low views).

This time, the flag was declined. But the reason seems bizarre and totally inappropriate to me...

Multiple versions of jQuery for one page 1 asked Sep 23 '11 at 11:24 by Randomblue

This is a duplicate of , and the OP even admits its a duplicate! Yet it somehow squeaked by the normal close process. – 10 hours ago
declined - We should learn to love duplicates.


  1. Is this a new policy, or a moderator glitch?
  2. Please vote to close the Q, if you agree that it is a duplicate.
share|improve this question
Perhaps the mod in question (mistakenly?) assumed you wanted it deleted instead of closed? – Bart Sep 28 '12 at 3:37
@bart: Perhaps. But I did use "duplicate" and "close process" in my flag report. – Awesome Poodles Sep 28 '12 at 3:40
Yeah, though it's the only plausible explanation I can think of. I often flag in similar fashion without problem, so I can only assume a small oversight of your intentions. – Bart Sep 28 '12 at 3:41
up vote 12 down vote accepted

For what it's worth, the decline message is a reference to the following blog post:

Dr. Strangedupe: Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying And Love Duplication

It says it is OK to leave some duplicates open. That's fine by me, but I disagree that what's being said applies to the question you refer to. Personally, I would have closed the question because

  • (as mentioned) the OP admitted/agreed it's a dupe
  • (as mentioned) the questions are indeed the same
  • the duplicate has been answered adequately; so there's little reason to leave both questions open to new answers

If the similarities are there but it didn't seem like a clear-cut duplicate I would have dismissed it as helpful without closing or deferred it to another mod, and if it was an obvious non-dupe I'd decline. But neither was the case for this question.

So, had I gotten here earlier, I would most definitely have closed the question. Keep in mind though, different mods have different opinions. But we all love one another, don't we?

share|improve this answer
+1 - Marking as helpful would have been the way to go. The decline message seems a bit passive aggressive. It'd be nice if the mod who did that could step forward and explain what the thought-process behind this was because it won't encourage someone like Brock to do good deeds and be a good flagger. – jmort253 Sep 28 '12 at 4:19
@jmort253: Trust me... he's not the only one who gets all passive-aggressive in decline messages :) – BoltClock's a Unicorn Sep 28 '12 at 4:22
Thanks for explaining the SE history of that decline comment. – Awesome Poodles Sep 28 '12 at 4:23
I can understand why. You guys deal with a TON of flags, so no one's asking you to be perfect. ;) Not that we can't reflect though. :) – jmort253 Sep 28 '12 at 4:23
Summer's over. School's back in session, kids. Welcome to the autumn of disdain. – casperOne Sep 29 '12 at 2:20

It's not a new policy, but I would not say it was a rogue moderator. Probably the moderator saw there were more than one vote to close it, and/or thought it was not necessary doing anything about the question.

If you used a custom reason for the flag, the rejected reason would be a funny way to reject your flag. Your reputation on Stack Overflow allows you to vote to close a question; in that case, if there isn't something that requires the question to be immediately deleted, or closed, you should not flag the question for moderation attention.

share|improve this answer
Did you read the question? He stated that he flagged because it was an old question with low views. That is a perfectly acceptable way to flag. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Sep 28 '12 at 3:48
I am not saying the question should have been closed, or not. I am just saying that I don't see any reason to flag a question, if it just to close it, when the user has already the privilege of voting to close any question (as he did). – kiamlaluno Sep 28 '12 at 3:51
If a question is old and unlikely to get attention but is better off closed all the same, a flag for moderator attention to weigh in is not an inappropriate use of a flag. – Bart Sep 28 '12 at 3:52
I just mentioned one reason in my comment... – BoltClock's a Unicorn Sep 28 '12 at 3:52
Please see Close Votes expire too soon for low-traffic tags (and several others). Flagging is the most sensible fallback for when the close-vote system fails. I've done this dozens of times, with no problem until now. (One reason why I looked for a change in policy) ... The alternative is to post on Meta, but that's much more resource-intensive. – Awesome Poodles Sep 28 '12 at 3:53
@BoltClock'saUnicorn Is that a reason even with the new review queue? I have seen old questions being closed on the past days, on Drupal Answers, even if they were asked about 1 year (or more) ago. – kiamlaluno Sep 28 '12 at 3:54
@BrockAdams When did you flag the question, and when did you vote to close it? – kiamlaluno Sep 28 '12 at 3:58
@kiamlaluno: It has always been the case. I don't know about DA, but SO has so many questions that we can't afford enough views on every one for them to be closed. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Sep 28 '12 at 4:00
@kiamlaluno, I did both about 11 hours ago. As I state in the Q, I give such questions the ol' "one two". – Awesome Poodles Sep 28 '12 at 4:00
@BrockAdams Maybe the moderator saw the question had more than one vote for closing it, and thought it was not necessary to do anything in that case. Or he simply thought it was a case where the duplicate should have been left open. – kiamlaluno Sep 28 '12 at 4:11
Still, a better explanation should have been given for the decline, or it should have been marked as helpful. Brock is clearly acting in SO's best interests, although I disagree with his approach of calling the moderator a "rogue". I'm getting a bit sick of people using that word to describe mod actions they don't like. It's not constructive, and isn't going to encourage constructive feedback from the person who might have had an error in judgement because he's human. – jmort253 Sep 28 '12 at 4:20
@jmort253, Okay I toned down the adjectives. – Awesome Poodles Sep 28 '12 at 4:26
@kiamlaluno, There was only one close-vote (mine) when the flag was declined. The other close-votes came only after this meta Q. – Awesome Poodles Sep 28 '12 at 4:28
The thing is, declined should be used sparingly. As a mod, you use that when you want to explicitly discourage a behavior. Even if you don't take action it's still sometimes a good idea to mark a flag as helpful if it's borderline. You don't want to alienate your helpful flaggers. :) – jmort253 Sep 28 '12 at 4:40
Of course, @kiamlaluno, if a flagger obviously doesn't understand the difference between not an answer and a wrong answer, educate them using the decline message, but if the flagger has the right idea, it might be wise to use discretion. :) – jmort253 Sep 28 '12 at 4:57

I'm not sure why you're even flagging a question as a dupe? There are already processes in place to have it closed as a dupe (it's the top reason when you click 'close'), and also to delete it once closed should you so wish

I think the moderator flagging should be reserved for more "serious" issues, such as abuse, leaving the simpler dupe/off-topic/useless-to-others reasons to the community processes.

share|improve this answer
Okay, but a moderator has already said "That is a perfectly acceptable way to flag." -- as have other mods and Jeff. See the linked Q and its linked Q's. – Awesome Poodles Sep 28 '12 at 8:52
@Brock, yes, a moderator. Not all moderators may think the same. Once they're "elevated", I suspect they're given quite a bit of leeway. Strangely enough, not every one of the 10Krep+ people think the same way either, as evidenced by some of my own disagreements :-) It's probably not as bad as the "if you ask ten economists, you'll get eleven answers" but certainly there's variety. – paxdiablo Sep 28 '12 at 8:57
Agree to disagree on the part about flagging old, unattended questions (different people have different opinions), but sometimes I do wish we had less mundanities to deal with (crappy questions, non-answers, etc which tend to... sort of stock up) in proportion to isolated, severe issues which need our immediate attention. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Sep 28 '12 at 19:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .