Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I was exploring the "Unanswered" tab trying to find an unanswered question I could answer. I think there should be a mechanism to sort out the Questions that shouldn't have answers so they don't appear there. Questions such as FAQ for Stack Exchange sites and Stack Overflow mentioned on NPR's "Wait, Wait... Don't Tell Me" and NY Times are wonderful to have as a reference point - but don't need an answer.

share|improve this question
Why not just filter out the "discussion" tag? – Nicol Bolas Oct 7 '12 at 16:29
I appreciate all the answers about search queries. However, not all Stack Exchange members are programmers or other professionals who routinely do search queries. Risking more down votes, I still think there should be a better way to find unanswered questions that are actually looking for answers. – Jeni Oct 7 '12 at 17:24
How do you magically determine what is "looking for answers" and what is not? – Nicol Bolas Oct 7 '12 at 17:24
Perhaps a specific tag could be used – Jeni Oct 7 '12 at 23:59

All you need to do is refine your search queries slightly and you'll be able to browse through posts which have no answers at all. For example -

This search query will return questions with the tag that have zero answers. There are many additional conditions that you can add to your queries. They are listed on the search help page.

There is also some confusion about the title of that "unanswered" tab. The posts listed there are not necessarily unanswered - but rather do not contain an "accepted answer".

share|improve this answer

You could always perform a search yourself using something like

answers:0 -[faq]

That won't get rid of the second questions you've linked, but the validity of that one is debatable anyway. It probably only remains because this is Meta.

share|improve this answer

If this type of question were on the main site then I'd be concerned.

However, as it's Meta, these types of question are fine.

The meta sites bend (if not break) the normal rules of Stack Exchange in all sorts of ways - including the type of "question" that is allowed.

You can use Meta for announcements etc.

share|improve this answer
Was this a mis-post or something? Doesn't really seem related to this post... – Lix Oct 7 '12 at 12:09
@Lix Nah, I think this addresses the "Questions that shouldn't have answers are fine for Meta" part just fine. – Bart Oct 7 '12 at 12:23

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .