Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

It would be nice to support showing images in their original size when they where automatically resized because they are too big to fit in a question or answer (Example).

I envision it just like in blogs or facebook: You can click on the image and it is shown in its original size in an overlay.

share|improve this question
FWIW Quora does implement it. I can see pros, I don't see any cons. – Franck Dernoncourt Jan 14 '14 at 5:12
Hi! I noticed that the example here leads to a deleted question, most likely because this request is a few years old. I know you're busy and it's not a big deal, but I was wondering if you might be willing to link to a different example. I'd like to see an overlay too, but in the meantime, I hope this change makes your life here easier. Thanks! – Sue Aug 20 '15 at 17:11

We haven't implemented an overlay (the community was more divided on this), but from now on, the image uploader automatically wraps images in a link to themselves, which looks like this and should make your life easier:

[![enter image description here][1]][1]


Balpha is to thank for this change.

share|improve this answer
Awesome, thanks! – Shadow Wizard Jul 22 '15 at 13:39
Would it be possible to do this only when the image width exceeds the text width, please? Currently, it looks really ridiculous that a 100x50 px image gets hyperlinked to ... itself in the same size. – yo' Aug 8 '15 at 9:26
@yo' I agree. I posted several pictures well below the text body width and I had to remove the links because I kept thinking the images would actually link somewhere. A link should should only serve to provide extra information, not repeat the exact same image, in a new window. It adds no value. It makes sense to provide a link for oversized images. – Ambo100 Sep 3 '15 at 17:08
This is such a sad excuse (as a replacement) for so basic of a feature. – alex gray Jan 30 at 2:13
@Thomas, what about the MILLIONS of old posts created "before". They do NOT seem inherit this "feature". – alex gray Jan 30 at 2:15
Just to voice some dissent: I hate this feature. It would be nice to be able to disable it in some way. Clickety click, clickety click - oops, why is that image a link to nowhere? – E.P. May 24 at 12:02

This is a good idea. I'd like to see it on the site, without having to right-click, open in new tab or so. Just a click on the image and a nice fancybox (or similar) opens up:

enter image description here

It could look like lightbox or fancybox.

It's really annoying to have images scaled down so that they aren't well readable anymore, and having to right-click, copy image URL, open new tab, paste, enter in order to see the full size image.

share|improve this answer

Your browser already supports that. Right-click the image, click "Open Link in New Tab". You get a zoom cursor in IE, Firefox, Safari and Chrome (quite possibly others).

share|improve this answer
That's how I do it right now. However, the usability of that approach is meager at best. – Daniel Hilgarth Oct 18 '12 at 8:15
And: you can actually zoom, as a bonus. Works for me indeed. – Arjan Feb 2 '13 at 15:29
I dispute your "facts".  In IE, if you right-click an image, the "Open Link in New Tab" menu item is disabled (dimmed/gray) unless the image is a link (e.g., as done with the [![...][1]][1] markdown).  (I'm using IE 11.) – Scott Jul 7 '15 at 8:09
That is relying upon browser functionality and requires an extra click. Those extra clicks soon add up... :-) – Greenonline Jul 10 '15 at 11:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .