Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

People post puzzle or contest problems, without making any attempt to solve them (simply copying the original question). These questions get upvoted - not because the OP did a good job, but because the original source is good.

Examples (all copied verbatim from a contest, with no attempt at solving the problem):

A Dynamic programming problem

Permuting rows in an array to eliminate increasing subsequences

The answers are very interesting and I like reading both questions and answers.

Should such questions be converted to community wiki by moderators instantly, when they are first seen?

share|improve this question
You wonder if for some programming problems whether it breaches copyright to post it. – Andrew Oct 29 '12 at 21:23
That's one person, not "people"; though I agree with you it does happen. I'm not sure it's a massive problem but the lack of attempting to solve normally mean I vote to close / downvote. – ben is uǝq backwards Oct 29 '12 at 21:23
Converting the question to CW would force all the answers to be CW, so no. – Gilles Oct 29 '12 at 21:24
@Gilles Ahh I didn't know about that.. I suppose this answers my question. – max Oct 29 '12 at 21:26

If you feel the questions do not show research effort, downvote them. That's exactly why downvoting is for.

Community Wiki is only meant to encourage collaboration, and nothing else.

share|improve this answer

Those are very old questions. Do you have any recent examples? Under current practice, such questions would nearly certainly be closed.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .