Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I usually search for non-accepted non-closed newest questions in Java with this url.

Nowadays it seems to be including closed questions and questions with answers. Is this deliberate? Am I doing it wrong? It certainly seemed to work when I started using that technique.

share|improve this question
Strangely, now I have posted the questing and checked the link it seems to work. It certainly wasn't before I posted. Strange!! – OldCurmudgeon Nov 1 '12 at 12:21
If you manage to repro, can you screen-shot it? – Marc Gravell Nov 1 '12 at 12:22
Ctl F5 after a few minutes and now I see Java Program to read a html page and save its HTML code in a text file [closed] in the list. – OldCurmudgeon Nov 1 '12 at 12:45
And now it's gone! Perhaps it's a cacheing issue. If the search results list is cached but each entry in it is re-rendered against live data you'd get this kind of issue. e.g. Search results cached for 5 minutes but question is closed after 2 then the closed question will persist until the cache is refreshed but the question will render as closed. – OldCurmudgeon Nov 1 '12 at 12:53
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Nick assures me that this is due to delayed indexing (every 15 minutes) on searches that are done via lucene. So: if something changes from closed/not-closed in that window, it may be considered (as far as the actual search is concerned) incorrectly. When we know the data we want to show, we then show the actual state, without re-applying the filter to the UI.

We could potentially investigate a post-filter scan, to remove any that don't actually match when it comes to the UI. We already do this for our tag-based searches (if they have been deleted etc while we weren't looking).

share|improve this answer
Sounds like what I am seeing. :) Your call to add the post-filtering. – OldCurmudgeon Nov 1 '12 at 16:27

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .