Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

A new tag was created 20 hours ago and added to 3 older posts. The tag name itself is way too generic and the tag wiki is:

Customizing generic code for specific cases

Does the community agree that is a meta-tag for Stack Overflow and should be manually removed?

Update: Seems like specialized is a terminology specific to scala. A quick search reveals the following:

One interesting feature that was added to Scala in version 2.8 is specialization, using the @specialized annotation.

Annotate type parameters on which code should be automatically specialized. For example: class MyList[@specialized T] ...

Type T can be specialized on a subset of the primitive types by specifying a list of primitive types to specialize at: class MyList[@specialized(Int, Double, Boolean) T] ..

I guess it is not a meta-tag but an incorrectly named tag, so it should not be removed. How about we rename it to [specialized.scala]?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by CRABOLO, psubsee2003, Scimonster, gnat, ProgramFOX Jan 18 '15 at 18:27

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – CRABOLO, psubsee2003, Scimonster, gnat, ProgramFOX
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
I agree with you on the idea, but I notice the tag was added only to Scala questions. Maybe this is a technical term that has a specific meaning in Scala, and a better wiki and tag name would be in order instead of plain eliminating this? (Note that I am 100% clueless about Scala.) – Mat Nov 2 '12 at 10:06
1  
Certainly, that is the exact reason why I didn't remove the tag and asked here. In any case, a rename is essential otherwise it will be a mess to keep the tag usage clean after a while. – Aziz Shaikh Nov 2 '12 at 10:12
up vote 3 down vote accepted

This question suggests it's referring to a specific piece of Scala terminology, so it's not a meta tag as such (my emphasis):

Why are so few things @specialized in Scala's standard library?

I've searched for the use of @specialized in the source code of the standard library of Scala 2.8.1. It looks like only a handful of traits and classes use this annotation: Function0, Function1, Function2, Tuple1, Tuple2, Product1, Product2, AbstractFunction0, AbstractFunction1, AbstractFunction2.

That said, I would say it wants a better name: perhaps , if that's indeed the kind of thing it is. And a better tag wiki.

share|improve this answer
    
This seems sane, obvious and well-explained. I've retagged the four questions. Who wants to do the tag wiki? – Charles Nov 2 '12 at 16:39

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .