Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Please read the whole post, this is relevant.

I have been pondering the idea of writing a book for kids and/or people new to programming.

I would post questions on SO and use the answer(s) in the book. I'm not planning on getting rich from this, but after my costs are covered, who should get the money?

share|improve this question
Would this be the bulk of the book? Or these interactions sprinkled all about? – Stu Thompson Jul 1 '09 at 16:56
Sounds like Pogue's "World According to Twitter" Book. For the record, none of the people he asked questions to on Twitter will be seeing any cash :) – Sampson Jul 1 '09 at 17:04
DIBS! FIRSTIES! – Won't Jul 1 '09 at 17:19
Perhaps you could show proper documentation for all the costs incurred in producing and selling this book. After that, you could show the sales of the books. Anything earned after break-even could then be transferred to this noble website. I am not sure if this is too simplistic. But it might be one way of doing what you want. – Borat Sagdiyev Feb 1 '14 at 16:54
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Check out this FAQ item from the CC site.

Here's a snippet, please read the entire thing.

Can I still make money from a work I make available under a Creative Commons licenses?

Absolutely. Firstly, because our licenses are non-exclusive which means you are not tied down to only make a piece of your content available under a Creative Commons license; you can also enter into other revenue-generating licenses in relation to your work. One of our central goals is to encourage people to experiment with new ways to promote and market their work.

Secondly, the noncommercial license option is an inventive tool designed to allow people to maximize the distribution of their works while keeping control of the commercial aspects of their copyright.

So as long as the license is not under a "non commercial" license option. Which I believe the SO license is under.

share|improve this answer

Assuming this is a serious question, you should keep the money you earn. Otherwise, you could try tracking down the individual users whose content you're including, but this is not necessary to be able to publish it - just make sure you follow the terms of the Creative Commons 2.5 license and properly attribute your content. You'll also have to license your book under Creative Commons as well.

share|improve this answer
Does the CC license used here allow for profits to be made, though? Really, the only answer is to check with an intellectual property lawyer. – Thomas Owens Jul 1 '09 at 17:00
Oh yes - I wasn't going to pay individuals. I was thinking more of a charitable donation. – rjstelling Jul 1 '09 at 17:04
Maybe you could buy some adspace on SO for your favorite open source projects then? That would benefit both SO and those projects. – Kyle Cronin Jul 1 '09 at 17:12
@Thomas: I've looked over the 'real' license ( and I don't see any restriction regarding commercial redistribution, but in any case you should always get a lawyer to make sure you've dotted your i's and crossed your t's in cases like these. – Kyle Cronin Jul 1 '09 at 17:13
@Kyle Maybe an ad for the book? Or would that be too meta :) – rjstelling Jul 1 '09 at 21:20
That could work :) – Kyle Cronin Jul 1 '09 at 21:36

I think you would have to release your book under the Creative Commons 2.5 Attribution-Share Alike License. This is why:

Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.

A book is a transformation (from digital to physical), I think.

However, I still think you MIGHT be able to sell your book. The Cathedral and The Bazaar is a book that is published, but also distributed under a free license.

I would consult a lawyer.

share|improve this answer
A PDF would be made freely available, any revenue would come from selling print copies. On or such-like. – rjstelling Jul 1 '09 at 17:07

David Pogue of the New York Times did something similar to this: "The World According to Twitter." I'm following him (@Pogue), and recall getting 10+ questions a day from him. He would ask his followers to rewrite a popular pun, or answer a question a particular way, and he would then pick from the responses which ones to include in his book.

I don't expect to see any money going to the twitter'er'er's who provided the content :) They weren't completely left un-awarded though. Here's Pogue's page for them:

That being said - I don't see anything wrong with taking the material, formatting it, organizing it, and selling your work.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .