Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I revisited old questions I asked a long time ago for which I didn't accept any answers.

It was somewhat problematic.

  • I do not need an answer any more. For some reason, the question is now irrelevant (abandoned project or whatever).
  • I do not even recall if I solved the issue or not
  • If I did solve it, I do not recall if it was using the answer or not.
  • In some cases, I didn't dig enough in the issue to gain enough experience to pick an answer

Should I blindly accept the seemingly best answer, delete the question or just leave it there to rot?

I was considering deletion because the answers might be bad. Someone with a similar issue might be dissatisfied with the answers and having the question already asked, he might not ask it again (duplicate).

Although, deletion might remove some useful answer that I cannot grasp...

And picking an answer blindly just to increase my accept rate really sounds dumb. (I'm going accept that 2+2 != potato because it quite possibly true!)

related question

share|improve this question
If any of the answers were upvoted, you can't delete it. (P.s. 2+2 does equal potato. Glad to help) – Bart Nov 14 '12 at 20:41
see this question and ones linked there, especially this one – gnat Nov 14 '12 at 22:11

You never need to accept an answer. No one should ever bother you about your accept rate. If a question has no answer that inspires you to accept it, then don't accept any.

share|improve this answer
I should have left out the blindly accepting answers since it's the less relevant part. – Kraz Nov 14 '12 at 20:46
Because the team hasn't gotten around to removing it, in spite of all the posting here about its counterproductivity. – Rosinante Nov 14 '12 at 21:27

Are the questions still useful? See if you can edit them into a form that future visitors might find useful by removing noise, adding detail, or whatever else needs to be done to make it into a good questions. Maybe you can nudge the question from something fairly open-ended into something which at least supports its highest voted answer.

If the questions aren't useful (maybe the question is now too localized or not a real question, or even a dupe of another question) you can flag appropriately, or vote to close. Or even delete your own question - if it's really a waste of cognitive effort for everyone who sees it, it can go away.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .