What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

I'm asking because of this by reading Marc's answer:

the emphasis is on a post, not a user.

Does this automated process also apply to moderators, or are they protected from this?

I mean, what if a user started voting up of all the posts of a specific moderator, then what will be the scenario?

share|improve this question
3  
Moderators can't be considered as normal. They don't eat. They don't sleep. They only drink the blood of spammers. –  Gnoupi Nov 21 '12 at 8:47
    
Moderator is also like administrator. Moderator is to track daily activities of forum –  Hari M Dec 19 '12 at 6:36

3 Answers 3

up vote 7 down vote accepted

That should answer your answer

(translation: Moderators aren't exempt from vote fraud scripts, neither are we given any special treatment. We are as rate limited as other users and treated the same.)

share|improve this answer
    
404 image not found –  Ian Nov 21 '12 at 12:30
1  
@Ian hm? Showing fine here. –  Sathya Nov 21 '12 at 12:32

If you vote for too many of a moderator's posts in a short time period, the voter fraud script will reverse them, the same way they would be reversed for any other user.

share|improve this answer
    
Actually the thing is that I'm one of the victim –  hotveryspicy Nov 21 '12 at 6:00
    
If I serially-voted your posts, they would be reversed during the next voter-fraud script run, just like any other user's serial voting. –  Robert Harvey Nov 21 '12 at 6:07
    
You mean to say, current fraud(triggers) + reserve fraud = demolition, is it? –  hotveryspicy Nov 21 '12 at 6:09
1  
@hotveryspicy - If you're referring to the votes going to you that were invalidated yesterday, no moderator was involved in that. It was all due to one normal user. –  Brad Larson Nov 21 '12 at 16:33
    
@BradLarson Okay, but now what I'm wondering that Automated's algorithm may be sometimes prove to be wrong. If a specific user always post perfect answer with proper explanation then he must deserves upvote, isnt it? –  hotveryspicy Nov 21 '12 at 16:47
    
@hotveryspicy: See meta.stackexchange.com/questions/156299 –  Robert Harvey Nov 21 '12 at 16:49

Yes, mods will be considered as normal user in that case. Automated process will be same for everyone including moderators.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .