Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Update: The "spam" closing reason has recently been removed.

Original post:

As far as I know, a user gets a 100 rep penalty when one of their posts is flagged as spam often enough. I just noticed that this does not happen when the question gets closed as spam.

I assume this difference in behaviour is intended, and thus it suggests there's supposed to be a difference between flagging as spam and voting to close as spam. So what should be done in what case?

When should I only vote to close as spam, and when should I also flag as spam (the third possibility, flagging but not closing, probably doesn't make sense)?

share|improve this question
I can still see it on MSO/SO... – Marc Gravell Oct 26 '09 at 12:42
@Marc Gravell: I guess it'll be gone when Jeff hits the big pink "Deploy!" button the next time... – balpha Oct 26 '09 at 12:59
@balpha - all sites are showing the version number as 5091, but SO and MSO still have "spam" as a close reason, while SU doesn't – ChrisF Oct 26 '09 at 16:18
up vote 11 down vote accepted

I agree, it's sort of redundant now that we have flagging.

I am considering removing "spam" as a close reason, just to simplify the close list a bit.

share|improve this answer
@Jeff: I prefer to let the community have the option of closing as spam. This leaves more power in the hands of the people, and often gets faster results than a moderator flag in extremely obvious cases. The flag is still necessary for older posts that get under the radar, though. – Bill the Lizard Aug 20 '09 at 12:06
@Bill the Lizard: I thought "spam" flags are dealt with automatically, without need for moderator attention? – balpha Aug 20 '09 at 12:32
@balpha: You're right, I thought it was only for offensive flags, but 6 spam flags will result in an automatic deletion as well. Disregard my prior comment, I need to read the FAQ again. :) – Bill the Lizard Aug 20 '09 at 15:58

Since not everybody can close the spam flag is needed. The flag means to get the attention of a moderator, which they might not of seen the question yet or at all.

If you have enough rep to close a question that is spam, vote to close the question.

If nobody else is voting to close because of low views, etc. . . Then i would use the flag as a back up procedure to get attention to a moderator.

share|improve this answer
You're suggesting that both ways are pretty much the same. But the absence of rep penalty for posts that were closed as spam says different. – balpha Aug 20 '09 at 10:13
and spam in a closed question is still spam. the question is only closed, not deleted after all. – innaM Aug 20 '09 at 11:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .