Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I am an avid user of Stack Overflow and other Stack Exchange websites. I have noticed that some of the Gravatars used by members which were x-rated, get displayed. Why does the Stack Exchange community allow users to keep x-rated Gravatars? Why can't we filter the X-rated Gravatars for the members?

It has already been mentioned by ceejayoz in his answer to this question and my query is why can't we block the x-rated Gravatars here? There are many budding programmers under 18 visiting this site regularly.

share|improve this question
up vote 9 down vote accepted

Stack Exchange requests the PG version from Gravatar, not the X-rated version. So it is up to the users to correctly classify their gravatar images.

If you see an X-rated gravatar you can flag a post from that user for moderator attention, the images are expected to be safe for work here. There's some disagreement on what people find offensive or inappropriate, but in general any 18+ only content is not a good idea for a gravatar image.

share|improve this answer
Stupid question: can a moderator do anything about this other than kindly ask the user to change it? – Bart Nov 30 '12 at 13:34
Given the context, that "18+" is disproportionately amusing, since the "sufficient" age varies from country to country (and even [sub-national political administrative/territorial unit] to [sub-national political administrative/territorial unit]). – Pops Nov 30 '12 at 13:37
@Bart I don't remember the details, but a few months ago a mod removed some user's avatar (not sure if he had to kick the issue up to the dev team or not, though). EDIT: oh wait, here we go, and another one for good measure. – Pops Nov 30 '12 at 13:38
@Bart It's a bit of a hack, but the gravatar is tied to the mail address, a moderator can change that one. Not an ideal solution, but possible. – Mad Scientist Nov 30 '12 at 13:39
@MadScientist you're exactly right, as Kyle explains for the second link: "Since it was GMail, I added a '+youravatarisoffensive' before the This won't affect notification, but it's technically a different address, so it has a different hash." – Pops Nov 30 '12 at 13:43
why cant we have flag this avatar under user profile page,since it sounds indirect method to flag the user's post/activity,it may help moderators of se sites to maintain the site – BlueBerry - Vignesh4303 Nov 30 '12 at 14:09
@vignesh flagging a post is totally sufficient. – Pëkka Nov 30 '12 at 14:34
@vignesh4303: I think you overestimate how many inappropriate avatars are used here. It's probably a very tiny minority. So why waste valuable developer time on such a feature? Besides that, you could always contact gravatar about the inappropriate avatar rating - I'm sure they'll remove such an avatar quickly. – ThiefMaster Nov 30 '12 at 14:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .