Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I asked a question about how my code can interface with Quicktime - a formerly popular solution for browser audio, I felt that it was relevant to a wider audience than myself, and it should have a specific answer. It is also a very real problem which I need to solve asap.

I recognize that frequently the precise skill combination required to answer such a question is uncommon - which is most of the reason that I put it on Stack Overflow.

When I do solve such odd questions, I have a policy of posting my solution as an answer (and if another answer which I could not accept is more generalized, accepting it instead), thereby search-indexing the answer for the next person with the issue.

Why was this particular question on Stack Overflow closed as "Off Topic"?

share|improve this question
1  
Had you flagged the question with a custom explanation, I might have summarily reopened it, as I too don't see how this is off-topic. However, since you've asked for community input, I'll wait and see what the community has to say. ;) – Robert Harvey Dec 4 '12 at 21:07
    
Note that comments you place on your own post will go unanswered unless you preface them with @user; nobody is listening. See meta.stackexchange.com/questions/43019/… – Robert Harvey Dec 4 '12 at 21:07
3  
I have to say it took me some reading to discover the programming question there. The particular format is somewhat confusing. "Ah, that's his problem. What, he has a solution already? What's this alternative business? Hmm, seems like a Super User question...ah no, wait a minute" – Bart Dec 4 '12 at 21:08
1  
it is a poorly presented question though. The requirements aren't very clear, and you don't get to the point quick enough – Sam I am Dec 4 '12 at 21:10
    
I'll avoid using an expository format in the future then - thank you for the feedback, @Bart and Sam-I-am. – Iiridayn Dec 4 '12 at 21:16
    
@RobertHarvey thank you for clarifying a better course of action. I'll use flags if I should have similar (hopefully valid) concerns. – Iiridayn Dec 4 '12 at 21:20
    
@RobertHarvey Link to the link to the main FAQ is helpful, had never heard of it before. Will now read entirely. – Iiridayn Dec 4 '12 at 21:26
up vote 5 down vote accepted

That looks like an on-topic question to me. I've gone ahead and reopened it.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .