Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Using the review queue for Suggested Edits I've noticed there's a user editing questions and answers for "better highlights". This is basically making the most relevant words (to the user's criteria) bold.

Seeing a number of them are getting approved, are these kind of edits considered good edits? It would be appropriate for a number of them to use code blocks instead (this might be related to Please list code highlighting before bold and italics in Stack Overflow's editing help). The other ones, in my opinion, just blot the post. I really don't think I'd like to see bolds everywhere around when reading a question/answer.

Would it be appropriate in this case to flag a post for moderator attention (as explained in Is it possible to flag an edit for abuse?)

EDIT They seem to keep coming even after flagging a post for mod attention. I've left a comment to the user, but it doesn't look like he's going to give up on his "better highlights" editing spree.

EDIT 2 Actually, a similar thing happened some months ago with italics. The linked questions there already seem to address the underlying issue :

share|improve this question
They still keep coming – Xavi López Dec 13 '12 at 13:11
Still bolding – Xavi López Dec 13 '12 at 13:40
One other thing I noticed he is editing some downright awful answers (stuff that should be flagged as NAN). I've flagged those offending answers and at least 1 is deleted now. – psubsee2003 Dec 13 '12 at 13:46
up vote 23 down vote accepted

These are terrible edits.

There is absolutely not need to bold the "relevant words" inside a post - this only generates noise and makes a post harder to read.

So, yes - this user should definitely be flagged. These are not helpful or useful edits - they, in my opinion, are actively harmful.

share|improve this answer
Indeed. Not to mention it's yielding rep to said user. – Xavi López Dec 13 '12 at 12:30
Problem is he/she is making some useful edits at the same time in some questions. Some of the edits are fixing capitalization and grammar mistakes at the same time as the "highlighting". Some of the things he highlighting might fit as code and not highlight. I think he generally believes he is helping, so it is just a matter of someone telling him it is not appropriate. – psubsee2003 Dec 13 '12 at 12:44
And the sad thing is, we focus on the user now, but it's really the reviewers causing all the trouble. After a couple of proper rejections, the message would have most likely been clear to the user. But now it gets accepted, so he "must be doing something right". :( – Bart Dec 13 '12 at 13:24
@Bart Couldn't agree more. The community should be sensible enough to reject these edits. – Xavi López Dec 13 '12 at 13:26
I've tried to go through and reject some of the worst edits when they come up in the queue so hopefully he gets a 7-day banned just to slow him down and maybe even make him come to MSO so we can explain it – psubsee2003 Dec 13 '12 at 13:33
@Bart or Oded is there a faq for "How To Edit". Seems like that would be useful to point people who are not editting the best. – psubsee2003 Dec 13 '12 at 14:41
@psubsee2003 - Perhaps this? – Oded Dec 13 '12 at 14:42
@psubsee2003 Not that I know of. At least not in a form that would address what this user was doing. Let's hope the message is clear now. Though it's really not this user who is the problem. If the majority of such edits get through review, the review system is broken. How do we expect users to learn what good edits are when those who review don't seem to know. – Bart Dec 13 '12 at 14:48
@Bart, absolutely, definitely not the users fault, but a faq that maybe pulls together all of the varied MSO posts on appropriate editing might be useful. Then maybe there could be a link in suggested edit after it is rejected so the suggester can learn more – psubsee2003 Dec 13 '12 at 14:51
@Oded I was thinking more detail and contain specific instructions as to what "substantial" means, when code formatting is appropriate, and things to look for like tags in titles, salutations, tags likes, thanks. – psubsee2003 Dec 13 '12 at 14:54
@psubsee2003 - Unfortunately "substantial" is very open to interpretation... – Oded Dec 13 '12 at 14:55
@Oded I know :-) I was hoping that if we got it into a faq, it would help clarify it – psubsee2003 Dec 13 '12 at 14:56

It is rather difficult to find text that needs to be highlighted in bold.
I would understand formatting text as code, when it is code (a function, method, or class names), but not highlighting as code something that is not code.

Then, it is valid the usual rule: Is there anything that needs to be improved? If there is something else that needs to be improved, and the suggested edit is just changing the formatting of a word, it is too minor.

share|improve this answer
You’re spot on the money about finding it difficult to find text that needs bold highlighting. I’ve no idea why, I’m now seeing a huge whole lot of this over-emboldened text coming through on the initial posts, whether questions or answers. I feel like it’s pejorating not ameliorating, and I don’t understand why. It almost like people are constantly yelling at you in all caps. There is no need for that. – tchrist Aug 18 '14 at 4:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .