Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

If someone reports a problem, and others cannot find a mistake in the code, it may turn out to be a bug in the software used.

Basically, I was wondering if SO is a valid platform for apparent bug-reports and/or bug-investigations?

If not, how do we deal with these questions?

Example: Pyramid returning wrong Content-Type HTTP header for static assets

share|improve this question
    
For example? This is a bit too vague... – Oded Dec 13 '12 at 13:55
1  
Do you expect the maintainers of the software to check Stack Overflow for bug reports? If no, then I wouldn't post it there. And even if so: What about a bug report is an actual question? – slhck Dec 13 '12 at 13:57
    
@ʞɔɥls I don't know if maintainers do or do not follow their own tags on SO. I don't have a particular bug myself, it's just that I have come across such questions a few times. Oftentimes these questions start out as users asking for help with an error. Only if several people do not see a user-mistake it may turn out to be a bug. – Jasper van den Bosch Dec 13 '12 at 14:03
    
PS with regard to the example: This question may definitely be of value to me and other mod_wsgi users, I am not trying to get rid of it, just trying to get a feel for this. – Jasper van den Bosch Dec 13 '12 at 14:06
4  
I see now. I understood "bug report" as an actual reporting of the bug in the question. If you ask a valid question and it turns out to be a bug, so be it, but that should of course be in the answer (or the question could be closed as too localized if that bug makes the problem unsolvable). – slhck Dec 13 '12 at 14:08
1  
Furthermore, if you can figure out a workaround, you can post it as an answer. Here's an example that recently happened to me: stackoverflow.com/q/13804194/1015495 – mikeTheLiar Dec 13 '12 at 15:11
up vote 13 down vote accepted

Such a question can definitely be valid for SO.

Especially if it's not clear from the beginning if the problem is a bug or not.

And this would be an appropriate answer:

It's a bug in line 42 of foo.lang, where they use > instead of >=. I've filed a bug report at http://thebugtracker.example.com/issue/42 and a workaround is to frobnicate the baz before calling foo.

share|improve this answer
2  
No, you should frobnicate the bar before calling foo. – BalusC Dec 13 '12 at 14:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .