Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I think getting no downvotes for an extended period should be recognised, for example:

  • no downvotes for 25 consecutive answers: bronze
  • no downvotes for 80 consecutive answers: silver
  • no downvotes for 200 consecutive answers: gold

It would be a mark of quality of answers, rather than sheer quantity, which is how some make reputation.

Edit

Perhaps to stop a driveby downvote affecting the clean run, it could be "less than 1% of votes are down votes" or similar

share|improve this question
10  
Sounds like a cool badge to have, but if you've made it to 399 consecutive answers without any downvotes and then a drive by downvote spoils it all, it will be harsh. – Yannis Dec 21 '12 at 3:21
1  
Only 25 to go for your bronze. – Chris Gerken Dec 21 '12 at 4:24
up vote 17 down vote accepted

Bad idea. I think this makes downvotes that much more negative, when we should encourage people to care less about them. Now downvotes can spoil your obtaining a gold badge?

share|improve this answer
    
Agreed. Down votes are to say this isn't very useful or may be wrong. Not to tell people "never post again" they are only a reminder for quality not quantity, Plus with the badges they can be turned into more negative "weapons" per say – DeadChex Dec 21 '12 at 3:51
1  
Exactly. They're not punitive, they're simply meant to sort good content from bad content. – meagar Dec 21 '12 at 13:21

The cynic in me sees it as troll-bait. This would be among the only circumstances I can think of where another user could actively and intentionally hinder your progress. Rep-wise, a serial downvoter can only remove 2 points against 10 per upvote, and as soon as it becomes obvious enough, the audits will catch the behavior.

But it's trivial to look at a reputation history and target at just the right moment and wreck your "clean record" badge.

It sounds fun, but it also reminds me of the disappointments of flag weight - watching that graph go up and up, only to drop way back down. That might actually encourage answerers to delete good answers if they receive a downvote among multiple upvotes (assuming deletion wipes the record), and that affects the whole community & wider Internet in the interest of rescuing a badge for the answerer.

share|improve this answer
    
That's not cynicism, it's common sense. The data explorer would even make it easy to look for likely targets (people with long strings of no downvotes historically). – McCannot Dec 21 '12 at 20:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .