Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

After discussions here on meta over the past years and practical initiative in the year 2012, it has been researched and practically established that the tag actually is not needed any longer and has passed it's lifetime.

All questions with the tag have been reviewed and the tag has been removed where appropriate and possible. The handful of questions that were locked due to being merged have also been corrected by diamond moderators.

This effort would not have been possible without the nice folks in the chat.

Please establish a tag synonym so that new users who enter the tag by accident don't tag their question with the "wrong" tag.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by CRABOLO, animuson, gnat, Monica Cellio, Martijn Pieters Jan 9 '15 at 20:19

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – CRABOLO, animuson, gnat, Monica Cellio, Martijn Pieters
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

I'd rather it be blacklisted than incorrectly synonymized. – animuson Dec 25 '12 at 4:39
So would I, but it's about to be a moot point. The locked questions have been removed. The tag is now on a deathwatch. The next time the empty tag reaper runs, it's going to disappear. – Charles Dec 25 '12 at 5:29
So that's what happened to my bronze [php5] badge. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Dec 25 '12 at 7:07
Sorry! (Not really.) – Charles Dec 25 '12 at 7:07
Last call for any reasonable objections to this, I plan to do between now and 1/1/2013. – Tim Post Dec 25 '12 at 7:26
@BoltClock'saUnicorn: Until there is no recalc, the PHP5 badges are rare and limited collectors editions. – hakre Dec 25 '12 at 11:35
X-Ref: Meta: Version tag in addition to main tag – hakre Mar 19 '13 at 7:37
up vote 9 down vote accepted

I did one last merge as a few more crept in since you posted, but this is now completed. is now synonymous with .

This is another example of how the PHP community does a fantastic job of curating the tag, thank you all for your efforts.

share|improve this answer

Arguments in favor:

  • As of December 2012, when people talk about PHP, it's about 5.x.
    • There will be no confusion between 4.x and 5.x questions:
      • The tag has received about 50-60 questions a year since 2009.
      • PHP 4.x development and support were halted in 2008.
    • There will be no confusion between 5.x and 6.x questions for the foreseeable future:
      • The source branch that was to be 6.0 was killed in 2010.
      • This was not completely apparent when the last synonym discussion was had.
      • It's unlikely that we'll see whatever follows 5.5 within a year, and everyone's already calling it 5.6 unofficially (mainly in the ext/mysql deprecation discussion).
  • Minor versions are the ones that matter in current discussions.
    • Almost every minor 5.x release has a tag dedicated to discussion of version-specific features:
      • - default filter, zip and JSON extensions
      • - namespaces, late static binding, closures, goto... eww
      • - traits, short array syntax, better array dereferencing
      • - generators, a password hashing interface, finally, etc
      • Apparently nobody cares about 5.1? It was a yawnfest anyway, with a focus on performance.
    • Nobody is proposing the removal or merging of these version tags.
  • In modern use, and even in retrospective historical use, is noise.

Previous arguments against that are now moot given modern use of PHP and the removal of all questions from :

  • "PHP5 != PHP"
    • This was barely true when it was said in 2010, and it's even less true now.
    • ... and even less true now that the tag has been removed from all current questions.
    • It would be better expressed "PHP !== PHP5 && PHP5 == PHP". *
  • Questions that do not belong to the tag should be removed from it.
    • This has been done. It took roughly twelve months, but it's done.

Previous arguments that have some weight:

  • Having but no is going to be trouble when we need
    • We'll deal with that a few years from now, if 6.0 exists.
    • Can we just make sure to use hyphens when the time comes?

tl;dr The time has come, push the button.

* This is a PHP truth table joke. PHP is the real joke here.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .