Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I just saw this question. It has 60 revisions, the same user adding and removing the same line of text.

I noticed it because the OP has 51 edit reviews, of the same post. So probably something went wrong in the database.

share|improve this question
2  
The timestamps differ—I would suspect something else is going on here (possibly one user trying to get his second account rep from suggested edits?) – waiwai933 Dec 27 '12 at 8:50
5  
I say the user found a way to re-submit the same two suggestions over and over again, gaming the system. Badge harvesting! – Martijn Pieters Dec 27 '12 at 8:50
    
Together with some sock puppetry; most edits have been approved by one 'Alligator', the OP of the question in fact. – Martijn Pieters Dec 27 '12 at 8:52
    
Soo dumb of him o.O – Bhuvan Rikka 웃 Dec 27 '12 at 8:52
2  
There is no rollback involved as far as I can tell, just gaming the system. – Shadow Wizard Dec 27 '12 at 8:58
7  
Hmm.. think you also found a nice bug: 12 edits (no matter who made them) should convert a post to Community Wiki however in this case it's still not CW probably because suggested edits are not counted. – Shadow Wizard Dec 27 '12 at 9:00
5  
Oh good gawd. – Tim Post Dec 27 '12 at 9:05
3  
Aw man, this guy. He "reported me to SO" for allegedly downvoting one of his horrible (deleted) questions. That was fun. – Charles Dec 27 '12 at 9:06
12  
I've contacted those that needed to be contacted privately and dealt with what needed to be dealt with. Thanks for shining a light on this. Of all the ways to game the system, this one never crossed my mind. – Tim Post Dec 27 '12 at 9:17
    
@ShaWizDowArd: I think for CW you need a certain number of different authors. – Martijn Pieters Dec 27 '12 at 9:40
    
@MartijnPieters nope, I'm 99.999% sure that 12 edits of OP also makes it CW. – Shadow Wizard Dec 27 '12 at 9:41
2  
@ShaWizDowArd: What are "Community Wiki" posts? five different users, or 10 edits by the original owner. – Martijn Pieters Dec 27 '12 at 9:43
    
@MartijnPieters yeah, for some reason always thought 10 edits as a "total limit" of edits. So looks like two, three or four users can edit a post hundreds of times without making it CW. – Shadow Wizard Dec 27 '12 at 9:44
up vote 17 down vote accepted

This is case of sock-puppetry and badge harvesting. The OP has approved most of the suggested edits, and they are all separate.

Flag the post for moderator attention, I certainly will.

share|improve this answer
5  
Might also be just two friends, but this is obviously bad behavior and they both should be warned and suspended if they keep doing it. – Shadow Wizard Dec 27 '12 at 8:57
    
@ShaWizDowArd: I reported it as such ("sockpuppet or friends"); but the definition of a sock puppet doesn't exclude two friends boosting one another. :-) – Martijn Pieters Dec 27 '12 at 9:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .