Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I know it's possible to exceed the review limit for suggested edits but I was wondering how can this be possible for other queues, like Late Answers or First Posts?

Except the fact that a queue can suddenly spikes up in size, then everyone can reach the limit.

Since few days, one guy always reached the 20 limit per day, sometimes by 1 or 2, so I guess it can happend for someone, but today it's 37 :o

Does the same problem from early november come back (ie: open multiple tab to got more review) or is it a new one ?


Edit:

Problem #1

Thanks to Daniel Fischer, I've found a new way to cheat the system. You can review a post twice by made a modification and hit Done and also hitting No action needed.

How to reproduce:

  • open twice the review page (when you are on review/first-posts/XXXXX)
  • on one tab, make a modification and hit Done
  • on the other tab, just hit No action needed

You'll review the post twice. As I did for this one.

Problem #2

If you open multiple tabs for multiple reviews you can review all posts twice and then reach more than 20: 40 if you're good. Using the same trick:

  • make a change
  • hit Done
  • hit No action needed for the other tab

I did it for the last one, and I'm now at 21.

share|improve this question
2  
That user reviews the same items twice often, e.g. here, but just look at the activities tab. It may be the system, but that doesn't seem right. – Daniel Fischer Dec 29 '12 at 19:01
5  
This sounds like it's another opportunity to ban people from review. I imagine it'll be fairly difficult to combat but extremely easy to detect... – ben is uǝq backwards Dec 30 '12 at 21:30
2  
@benisuǝqbackwards Yes. That should totally lead to a longish review ban. Unless the review queue code is severely borked, that's clear evidence of cheating. (<jk>Sorry, j0k, no exemptions for science.</jk>) – Daniel Fischer Dec 30 '12 at 22:53
1  
@animuson why [new-users] instead of [first-posts]? This is not for new-users since the one that mostly cheats is an established user. – j0k Dec 31 '12 at 7:12
1  
@j0k: You're reviewing first posts, which come from new users. Hence the tag. It is also stated clearly in the review tag wiki to use the new-users tag when referring to specifically the First Posts review task. – animuson Dec 31 '12 at 7:33
    
@animuson okay thanks, didn't know that. – j0k Dec 31 '12 at 7:36
3  
This "exploit" will be fixed in our next build. – Emmett Jan 4 '13 at 21:28
    
@Emmett Great ! – j0k Jan 4 '13 at 21:31
2  
Wow, people really will do anything to get a badge... – LittleBobbyTables Jan 4 '13 at 21:54
up vote 9 down vote accepted

Sorry - my bug :) There was a case where multiple browsers could be left open to several different reviews all of which could be completed to exceed the max. It's fixed now.

I blame the hat over my eyes.

share|improve this answer
    
Are you sure the problem is solved ? Just tried and I still can review an item twice. – j0k Jan 5 '13 at 8:52

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .