What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

This question regarding theming Drupal views was quickly closed as "too localized" and I fail to understand why. Views is a de facto standard module for Drupal and the problem the OP was facing is regularly encountered by people not familiar with the module, including myself a couple of years ago.

Apparently this question was called for a close vote in the PHP chat room.

share|improve this question
    
So would you say this is a programming question or a support question in how to use templating in Drupal? (I would tend a bit for the later, esp. in the way the OP asked). –  hakre Jan 2 '13 at 15:32
3  
@hakre Drupal questions are often a bit murky like that. I would lean towards your assessment too, but technically the solution does involve code (and could have involved more had a different type of answer been given - the potential is definitely there). I have to say it's not a very good question though, probably could have been closed for at least one other different reason. Too localised doesn't seem right here –  Clive Jan 2 '13 at 15:35
    
While it might not have been correct, if one honestly assumed that the question would be likely to only help the OP (and I can see how people would have that assumption the way it was initially asked), then it would seem quite a bit more appropriate. As Clive said, Drupal can be murky waters. –  Tim Post Jan 2 '13 at 15:42
5  
@TimPost It was posted in the PHP chat as only "[cv-pls] link" without a single line about what is wrong with the question. I'm not surprised that such a practice leads to bad closures. –  Mad Scientist Jan 2 '13 at 15:47
1  
And the question is a duplicate, as I suspected, which is pretty much the opposite of too localized. –  Mad Scientist Jan 2 '13 at 15:51
    
@MadScientist They do have a user script that one boxes such links, but I'll have a chat with them about it. –  Tim Post Jan 2 '13 at 15:51
    
From the revision summary, it looks like it had something to do with semantics pedantry. –  Asad Jan 2 '13 at 15:54

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .