What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 128 Stack Exchange communities.

When moderators decline flags, they have several predefined reasons to choose from, as well as the ability to type in a custom message.

Declined Reasons

There are several phrases I still find myself typing in repeatedly to the "other..." field, so I consulted with other moderators to see if we could come up with some additional suggestions for common messages to be added to the dialog above.

  1. Will not delete. Other people may find the answer(s) useful.

    This one is to be used when users flag their own open and answered question for deletion. People often do this when they want to remove an old question that they're embarrassed by, or when they posted code from their work or school that they shouldn't have. If the question is already closed or has received no answers yet we can just delete it, but if they've received useful answers these types of flags should be declined.

  2. Questions older than 60 days cannot be migrated. See Disable migration for questions older than 60 days.

    People often request migration of older closed questions to new sites. Right now we still have to decline these fairly often, but hopefully that will change as more people learn of the 60 day limit. (Meaning this option could possibly/hopefully be retired at some point in the future.)

  3. This post is extremely bad and/or off-topic but it is neither spam nor offensive. Please do not use those flag types for simply bad posts.

    People often abuse the spam/offensive flags to get moderator's attention for posts that really don't require immediate action (or any action at all in some cases). This seems like it's on the rise lately on Stack Overflow, so we decline these flags to try and discourage people from abusing them.

Any suggestions for improving the clarity of these messages would be welcome.

share|improve this question
1  
We really need additional comments for helpful flags — the first two probably shouldn't be rejections. –  Daniel Beck Jan 15 '13 at 14:21
2  
@DanielBeck The first one definitely should be rejected. People are asking us to delete questions that they've received answers to because they posted their homework question and don't want to get caught, or because they have a job interview and don't want to be embarrassed by something they didn't know years ago. This isn't a reason to delete content. The second reason is arguable. I would prefer a way to tell people about the 60 day limit without declining the flag, but that's currently the only option open. –  Bill the Lizard Jan 15 '13 at 14:25
    
Number 3 probably needs the capability to decline individual flags, as a bad, but not spam post likely collects multiple flags before a mod sees it. Does it happen often enough that the only flag on such a post is an invalid spam/offensive flag? –  Mad Scientist Jan 15 '13 at 14:32
1  
@MadScientist We do now have the option (under the mod menu) to remove spam/offensive flags without declining them. I use this when there are valid flags on a post that shouldn't be declined. Since spam flags grab our attention pretty quickly, it is often the case that we process them before any other flags are added. –  Bill the Lizard Jan 15 '13 at 14:35
    
@DanielBeck: I've already sorta proposed that here –  Manishearth Jan 15 '13 at 14:42
    
@Manishearth Upvoted long ago. I'd have linked it as well, if I'd found it. –  Daniel Beck Jan 15 '13 at 14:43
    
I'm tempted to add "moderators can't accept answers to other people's questions" to the list, but that one doesn't come up quite every day. –  Bill the Lizard Jan 18 '13 at 2:53

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .