Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Are the rules of the Stack Exchange Network (as outlined in the FAQ) strictly enforced, with no exceptions, or is some flexibility allowed (with occasional exceptions)?

Does the Stack Exchange Network have any equivalent to Wikipedia's "ignore all rules" guideline, where some flexibility is allowed in the interpretation of the site's guidelines, or are all rules strictly enforced, without exception?

share|improve this question
I'm actually surprised that this question hasn't been asked before, considering how useful it would be to answer this question. – Anderson Green Jan 16 '13 at 2:38
This reminds me of the following paper, which makes a very interesting analogy. It compares laws (and other systems of rules) to fractals, with all their exceptions and corner cases: – Anderson Green Jan 16 '13 at 2:44
Not only there is flexibility, also the community moderation model used by Stack Exchange leaves room for different interpretations of the rules by those who enforce them. Which turns out to be quite nice. – bfavaretto Jan 16 '13 at 2:48
@bfavaretto: It can also cause a lot of consternation when people whose content has been moderated have a different interpretation than the people who did the moderating. – Al E. Jan 16 '13 at 14:35
up vote 17 down vote accepted

Each community has a different set of challenges that it must overcome in order to be a good, productive Stack Exchange site, which is why the guidelines in the FAQ are guidelines as opposed to strict rules written in stone.

While the goal of Stack Exchange is to be a resource of knowledge for years to come by focusing on high quality questions and answers, getting to this point involves interpreting and applying those guidelines somewhat differently in different communities.

For instance, the Skeptics SE community decided that they would enforce a strict interpretation of Good Subjective, Bad Subjective where each answer must be backed up with several sources. Other Stack Exchange sites, like Stack Overflow, pretty much avoid subjectivity completely, while Project Management Stack Exchange has a very laid back approach to this particular guideline.

If the Stack Exchange Community Managers feel that the site isn't producing high quality questions and answers, then they'll suggest the community take a different approach, but not being experts in the topic, the moderators are appointed to help the communities work through their issues so that they can become a productive Stack Exchange Q&A site.

In short, a community's rules are its own; however, they should be created within the spirit of what Stack Exchange stands for, which is to make the Internet a better place by focusing on high quality Q&A.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .