What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

The badge Research Assistant has been awarded to 68 individuals which is the minimum of all the badges including the gold badges.

  • Why is it so? Is it hard to earn?

  • As it is much more exclusive than the other Gold Badges, why isn't it a Gold Badge?

  • If having good quality Tag Wikis is beneficial for the site, and is what this tag seems to encourage, then why aren't there more such elements (badges, greater rep) on SO that work to encourage the same?

As this badge has been earned the least, it may be that there isn't sufficient motivation/encouragement for users to make good quality Tag Wikis*.

*Yes, this is not the most important part of the system, but it is important nonetheless.

share|improve this question
7  
It says 68... the probable reason is that having knowledge of 50 different subjects isn't easy. Then add in how hard it is to write tag wikis... –  ben is uǝq backwards Jan 16 '13 at 16:18
4  
Like Ben said, writing tag wikis is hard. Most people just seem to copy and paste entries from Wikipedia, and it feels like most of those aren't properly sourced. If you really want the badge, sort the Tags by the newest, and look for recently created tag wikis; odds are the text was plagiarized, and you'll get credit if you edit it to add the source to it. (I wasn't badge hunting, I just ended up getting it from correcting so many wiki entries.) –  LittleBobbyTables Jan 16 '13 at 16:39
1  
Also remember that most people do not hunt for badges. They edit tag wikis as the need arises instead. –  Martijn Pieters Jan 16 '13 at 16:40
    
If you examine the other badges, you will notice that the color of the badge and the number of users with the badge are not necessarily proportional. I also think it is a bit silly but it has been discussed on here before. –  Austin Henley Jan 16 '13 at 16:43
6  
@MartijnPieters "most people do not hunt for badges" says who?! Do you have some data to back this up? ;) –  Austin Henley Jan 16 '13 at 16:45
1  
You don't have to write entirely new tag wikis, it is enough to fix problems with the existing ones. However, that might have been easier 68x50 edits ago... –  Bo Persson Jan 16 '13 at 16:45
2  
@AustinHenley: Meh, I am not going to do that until the I-used-the-dataexplorer badge has been added! :-P –  Martijn Pieters Jan 16 '13 at 16:48
    
It's the least earned because it's the least deserved. –  Chris Gerken Jan 16 '13 at 17:03
    
@MartijnPieters I disagree with most people do not hunt for badges. SO is one of the best known sites and is one of the biggest successes of Gamification and badges are an integral part of it. Saying that badges dont matter to most, is i think inaccurate. –  AsheeshR Jan 16 '13 at 17:05
3  
@AshRj: The majority of users just want their question answered. If that gets them a bit of reputation and a badge, that's fun. The real hard-core 'players' are a much smaller group. –  Martijn Pieters Jan 16 '13 at 17:07
    
@MartijnPieters The superset of most in my statement are the regular active users about >=30,000 people (estimate seeing rep change +1 and total rep 200+ in leagues). If even a few thousand of these individuals chase badges, then thats ~10% of the total active community. Not a majority, but a significant portion nonetheless.......... which supports your statement and contradicts my own. Its a funny world :) –  AsheeshR Jan 16 '13 at 17:29
1  
@benisuǝqbackwards the probable reason is that having knowledge of 50 different subjects isn't easy - Not quite sure about this, many tags are kind of related so having knowledge in one area could get you a lot of edits. I got my badge just editing in the Android and Android related tags for example. –  Luksprog Jan 16 '13 at 18:03
    
There is this proposal, that maybe can change this a little bit: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/189554/… –  Andre Silva Jul 19 '13 at 20:35
    
@AndreSilva You may want to link to this post from your post as this has an official answer/opinion on the issue. –  AsheeshR Jul 20 '13 at 1:30
    
@AsheeshR. I am not sure how to make a good link from this answer, because it answered your question, but not answered your comment to it, which relates to the stated proposal. However, you are invited to suggest an edition to the question or to post a comment with this thread, or even an answer. The more users participate, the better is for the proposal being approved. Thank you. –  Andre Silva Jul 20 '13 at 1:45

1 Answer 1

up vote 10 down vote accepted

I think primarily because

  • it is a relatively new badge

  • tag wikis are a (somewhat) new concept

Tag wikis themselves have existed for maybe 2 years. Many of the other badges have existed for 4+ years and people have had many years to work on getting those badges.

Beyond that, it may be hard as noted in the comments, but age of the badge, and the feature it is a badge for, is a big factor.

share|improve this answer
    
To bring more attention to the tag wikis, why aren't there greater incentives than at present ? Tag wikis can be useful, but there are very few that are that. If there are good Tag Wikis, it will automatically get and generate more attention. But to get better, they need quite a bit of attention at first. So, why not give it a harder push ? –  AsheeshR Jan 18 '13 at 13:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .