Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I recently came across the tag, and was originally going to suggest that it be renamed to (since running the two acronyms together like that just looks silly). However, after thinking about it a bit more, I wonder if we really need that tag at all. Basically, all it amounts to is the intersection of the existing and tags.

Before I start manually retagging 84 questions, though, I'd like to ask if anyone has any better suggestions. In particular:

  • Do you agree that is a useless intersection tag, and should be replaced with and ?
  • Is there any easier way to do that than manually editing all the tagged questions?
share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by ProgramFOX, Martijn Pieters, Andrew Barber, Bill the Lizard, Monica Cellio Jul 24 '14 at 18:21

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – ProgramFOX, Martijn Pieters, Andrew Barber, Bill the Lizard, Monica Cellio
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Do you agree that [hmacsha1] is a useless intersection tag? No. This is like saying [jquery-ui] is a useless intersection tag that should be replaced with [jquery] and [ui] – NullUserException อ_อ Jan 18 '13 at 14:31
@NullUserException: But jQuery UI means something more specific than a user interface made with jQuery. HMAC-SHA1 does not really mean anything more specific than HMAC instantiated with SHA-1. – Ilmari Karonen Jan 18 '13 at 15:19
Tags are meant to make it easier for people to find questions. Now imagine we split the tags and someone wants to find a question about HMAC instantiated with SHA-1. I just think it's unreasonable to expect them to know they should search for [hmac] [sha1]. If an [hmac-sha1] tag is present, it's obvious. – NullUserException อ_อ Jan 18 '13 at 16:09
@Null: OK, I guess we just disagree on that, then; it doesn't really seem at all unreasonable to me. (That's why I asked this question, so thanks for your comments.) Ps. How about at least renaming the tag to add the hyphen, then? That at least would be an improvement, whether or not the eventual consensus is to keep the tag or not. – Ilmari Karonen Jan 18 '13 at 16:26
@Null: I just put a bounty on this old question to get some more opinions on it. Feel free to include yours, whether or not it's still the same as before. (Also, I apparently can't spell "third opinion" in the bounty message... *slaps forehead*.) – Ilmari Karonen Oct 26 '13 at 16:24

Well, six days after posting the bounty, the vote total for this question is now at +8 / −1. I take that to mean that, out of the apparently limited number of people who even care either way, at least a fairly large fraction do seem to agree that should be replaced with + .

Accordingly, I'm going to start retagging the questions soon. No promises on how long it's going to take, but it's only a little over 100 questions, so hopefully not too long (even if the manual retagging process is rather labor-intensive for something so simple).

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .