Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I think the fact that we requre/strongly ask OPs to provide evident research effort prior to asking is sort of an written rule. It's really embedded in the minds of the users that have been using the SE sites. Nevertheless, there is no explicit mention in the standard FAQ about researching and then asking.

We often see closures because users:

  • don't search the dictionary
  • don't provide their code (gimme teh codez), the user did/didn't write the code: who knows?
  • ask about an error that has been treated several times before
  • ask for translations without telling what they have tried

and so on. All of the questions where someone has said or wanted to say the famous "What have you tried?" are included here.

I know, lots of users don't even read the FAQ, but besides the fact that rules must be added regardless of that, this one is useful also for justifying actions against questions (i.e. downvoting/closing) that might be "challenged"; I think a "backup" is needed. I have personally added this requirement in the per-site FAQs of the sites I moderate, such as Chinese or Russian, stating this:

We do not forbid translation requests but note that this is not a translation service, so we will close any translation request that does not show research effort. Make sure you clearly show it in your question.

Perhaps it could use some improvement (I see a repeated expression) but the meaning is clear: we help anyone, no problem. But we're going to help, not do others' work. I think it's a matter of respect. Even Movies SE has a similar excerpt:

[...] Questions lacking in research, i.e. if a question is easily answered from an Actor's name on IMDB or Wikipedia will be closed.

But beyond that, I think this rule should be made official and I can't think of a site that wouldn't require it (even if not always). A starting wording I suggest:

When applicable, questions should always provide evident prior research effort. This way the community can answer better and more precisely your question basing on your previous results.

Or something similar, just an idea.

share|improve this question
It's in How to Ask though, which everyone should see: > Have you thoroughly searched for an answer before asking your question? Sharing your research helps everyone. Tell us what you found and why it didn’t meet your needs. This demonstrates that you’ve taken the time to try to help yourself, it saves us from reiterating obvious answers, and most of all it helps you get a more specific and relevant answer! – slhck Jan 26 '13 at 13:58
@slhck Ah yes, I forgot about that section. Perhaps either the section or the singular points should be more visible then? – Alenanno Jan 26 '13 at 14:01
Or, people should just not be idiots; skip over that part, click the "I agree, let me ask shiznitz!" and go ahead and post quality doodoo everywhere. Yes. I agree there is a problem. But people are going to step on the lawn no matter how many signs you put up. =/ – J. Steen Jan 26 '13 at 14:24
@J.Steen Like I said in the question, it will help us moderators to have a backup for those users that can't accept the decision. Not to mention that this is a way for the rule to be more prominent. – Alenanno Jan 26 '13 at 14:30
@Alenanno Yeah, my comment was a bit outside the actual topic of the question itself, I agree. – J. Steen Jan 26 '13 at 14:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .