Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
I was just attacked by an onslaught of downvotes! What do I do?

I've just received 3 downvotes in rapid succession on old questions, most likely just because I pointed out "copied" content as a comment in an answer to this question .

Is such downvoting to be expected and is it acceptable behaviour?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by casperOne Jan 26 '13 at 20:23

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Related/possible duplicate: I was just attacked by an onslaught of downvotes! What do I do? – psubsee2003 Jan 26 '13 at 17:24
@Bart: The plagiarism was real (in my view), and the 3 downvotes do look retaliatory. I fear that in this case the OP has a case and coming here was the right thing to do. – Martijn Pieters Jan 26 '13 at 17:27
up vote 7 down vote accepted

No, you shouldn't. Looking at your reputation history, I would strongly suspect that the serial voting cleanup script will revert these voting changes by tomorrow.

If you don't get your reputation back, ping at me (or another moderator) here and we can ask someone to look at it and roll it back if it is indeed all from the same person.

No, this is not the norm, nor is it condoned behavior.

The focus should be on the post, not the user.

share|improve this answer
Condoned—I learned a new word today! :-) – Arjan Jan 26 '13 at 17:31
@casperOne what if the DownVotes weren't serial? – AbZy Jan 26 '13 at 17:33
@AbZy The script will remove upvotes that seem to be heavily favored towards a user instead of the posts. If you go through and rapidly upvote a user's content, it's obvious that the vote is because you like the person and not the content. We want votes to (try to) be a representation of usefulness, and that representation is skewed if people vote for the person and not the post. – casperOne Jan 26 '13 at 17:50

You can flag and should flag the post for moderator attention, pointing out the plagiarism (which in this case is small, but it could be a sign of more endemic copying behaviour). I agree the post is a straight copy (down to the error that Soner edited out).

The retaliation you received is not normal behaviour either. With only 3 downvotes, it may slip by the serial-vote detection. If the votes have indeed not been reverted by tomorrow, ask a moderator to look into it.

share|improve this answer
I did say "nitpicking". – casperOne Jan 26 '13 at 17:26
@casperOne: I flicked the nick right back. :-P – Martijn Pieters Jan 26 '13 at 17:28
@MartijnPieters Yes , First thing I actually did was flagging the post. And Thanks I would hope they don't slip by :-) – AbZy Jan 26 '13 at 17:38

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .