Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

We've accumulated quite a few tags related to crypto. Several are just useless, some are ambiguous, and some are lacking hyphens.

Which should we kill, merge or rename?

- merge into [encryption]

- merge into [encryption]

- rename to asymmetric-encryption?

- merge with

rename to symmetric-encryption?

- merge into

- add hyphens

- add hyphens

- I dislike this tag

- retag individually, probably to obfuscation

- keep

- merge with digital-signature

- possibly merge with digital-signature. Might have a slightly different meaning, including digitalized normal signatures.

- merge with digital-signature

- vague, merge on case-by-case basic

- perhaps merge into public-key-cryptography

- a bit ambiguous sometimes used for the private half of an asymmetric key, sometimes for the key in a symmetric scheme

- similar to private key

- vague, kill

- used both in a crypto and in a hashtable context

- It's rare to salt hashes that aren't password hashes

- vague, retag to [hash] or something more specific. Often used for .net's HashAlgorithm class

- keep

- often abused for cases where password-hashes should be used

- retag to [encryption-symmetric] if encryption related. But some are symmetric-crypto but not symmetric encryption

- retag to [encryption-symmetric] if encryption related

One issue: encryption vs. cryptography

For example there is public-key-cryptography aka asymmetric-cryptography (no tags) which includes encryption, authentication and signatures. But we only have tags for public-key-encryption. Similar problems with other symmetric crypto that isn't symmetric encryption.

Related question: What is the difference between the cryptography and encryption tags?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by ProgramFOX, Martijn Pieters, Bill the Lizard, Monica Cellio, Shadow Wizard Jul 24 '14 at 18:32

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – ProgramFOX, Martijn Pieters, Bill the Lizard, Monica Cellio, Shadow Wizard
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2  
@BilltheLizard [encrypt] and [decryption] are already synonyms of [encryption], but [decrypt] isn't. I see little gain in having a separate tag for decryption. There may be minor differences, but in practice it just means that questions are randomly splattered over a several tags. – CodesInChaos Feb 9 '13 at 16:01
    
My mistake. Carry on. – Bill the Lizard Feb 9 '13 at 16:02

Current status of progress made:

(will edit in more as I make progress)

share|improve this answer
share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .