What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

We've accumulated quite a few tags related to crypto. Several are just useless, some are ambiguous, and some are lacking hyphens.

Which should we kill, merge or rename?

- merge into [encryption]

- merge into [encryption]

- rename to asymmetric-encryption?

- merge with

rename to symmetric-encryption?

- merge into

- add hyphens

- add hyphens

- I dislike this tag

- retag individually, probably to obfuscation

- keep

- merge with digital-signature

- possibly merge with digital-signature. Might have a slightly different meaning, including digitalized normal signatures.

- merge with digital-signature

- vague, merge on case-by-case basic

- perhaps merge into public-key-cryptography

- a bit ambiguous sometimes used for the private half of an asymmetric key, sometimes for the key in a symmetric scheme

- similar to private key

- vague, kill

- used both in a crypto and in a hashtable context

- It's rare to salt hashes that aren't password hashes

- vague, retag to [hash] or something more specific. Often used for .net's HashAlgorithm class

- keep

- often abused for cases where password-hashes should be used

- retag to [encryption-symmetric] if encryption related. But some are symmetric-crypto but not symmetric encryption

- retag to [encryption-symmetric] if encryption related

One issue: encryption vs. cryptography

For example there is public-key-cryptography aka asymmetric-cryptography (no tags) which includes encryption, authentication and signatures. But we only have tags for public-key-encryption. Similar problems with other symmetric crypto that isn't symmetric encryption.

Related question: What is the difference between the cryptography and encryption tags?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by ProgramFOX, Martijn Pieters, Bill the Lizard, Monica Cellio, Shadow Wizard Jul 24 at 18:32

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – ProgramFOX, Martijn Pieters, Bill the Lizard, Monica Cellio, Shadow Wizard
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2  
@BilltheLizard [encrypt] and [decryption] are already synonyms of [encryption], but [decrypt] isn't. I see little gain in having a separate tag for decryption. There may be minor differences, but in practice it just means that questions are randomly splattered over a several tags. –  CodesInChaos Feb 9 '13 at 16:01
    
My mistake. Carry on. –  Bill the Lizard Feb 9 '13 at 16:02

2 Answers 2

Current status of progress made:

(will edit in more as I make progress)

share|improve this answer
share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .