What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 127 Stack Exchange communities.

This user strikes again. This time it's:

Link to the original profile picture: http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc6/273260_1427736689_310442525_n.jpg

I noticed it can be fixed by changing the image source from http://graph.facebook.com/{id}/picture?type=large to http://graph.facebook.com/{id}/picture?type=normal. (or enforce maximum width in the CSS itself)

Edit: now the image height is constrained to 128 pixels, so when the width is bigger than the height and both more than 128 pixels, it leads to something like this: (profile link)

share|improve this question
    
strikes again? When did he strike before? –  hims056 Feb 13 '13 at 10:06
2  
@hims056 see my edit. :) –  Shadow Wizard Feb 13 '13 at 10:07
    
I don't think it's Facebook causing it, I've seen super-large Gravatars as well. –  tombull89 Feb 13 '13 at 10:31
    
@tombull89: most of those super large gravs are due to them being taken from FB. IIRC your avatar can be imported from FB as well, though I don't know the details. See meta.stackexchange.com/questions/164058/… –  Manishearth Feb 13 '13 at 10:53
    
The avatar is imported from Facebook if you used Facebook to log into the site for the first time. This issue of larger Facebook images is recurring and has appeared in a few avatar related issues. –  Lix Feb 13 '13 at 11:11
    
@tombull89 for images hosted on gravatar or imgur they put querystring parameter to resize them to the desired size e.g. my pic is http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/ab78492b42045cfabc0e857908519fea?s=128&d=identic‌​on&r=PG note the "?s=128". Even 10,000 pixels image will just be scaled down, server side. –  Shadow Wizard Feb 13 '13 at 11:17
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 5 down vote accepted

The network profile's avatar is now constrained to 128px similarly to the rest of the network.

share|improve this answer
3  
I saw its height is constrained (meaning the browser will scale the width) and there's no overflow: hidden; for its parent div, so for some pictures it still might break, no? –  Shadow Wizard Feb 13 '13 at 19:48
2  
And I was right... see this profile. (originally reported here). –  Shadow Wizard Sep 30 '13 at 7:26
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .