Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Let say: there is a tag, which is not very popular and there are only few questions using it. If I edit its tag-wiki, I'm gonna gain 2 reputation and the number of edits (for the "Research Assistant"-badge) is gonna increase. But what will happen, when the tag expires after six months? Will I lose the reputation? Will the number of edits for the badge decrease?

share|improve this question
    
Does 2 reputation really matter that much? – Linuxios Feb 19 '13 at 14:51
    
Many a mickle makes a muckle – Dirty-flow Feb 19 '13 at 14:54
1  
What? What does that mean? – Linuxios Feb 19 '13 at 14:55
    
2 reputation for a single edit is not much, but if you make 100 edits, you will earn 200 reputation. And for me 200 reputation does matter – Dirty-flow Feb 19 '13 at 15:03
    
2  
And if you're trying to get reputation from editing, you're using the site wrong. – Linuxios Feb 19 '13 at 15:05
    
@Linuxios No, the system gives reputation for approved edits for a reason. – Eliah Kagan Feb 19 '13 at 16:04
    
@EliahKagan: I know. But if you really want reputation, how about you answer things instead? – Linuxios Feb 19 '13 at 16:06
    
@Linuxios Good edits are fundamentally useful. You could take your reasoning a step further and say that users who want to earn reputation shouldn't answer non-bountied questions. – Eliah Kagan Feb 19 '13 at 16:08
1  
@EliahKagan: That's not my argument. My argument is to edit for the sake of editing, not for the sake of 2 rep. Answer for the sake of answering. Rep can be your priority, but still do for the sake of doing. – Linuxios Feb 19 '13 at 16:11
2  
@Linuxios are you thinking I'm doing something like this. Creating tag wikis for new tags is very useful, and nobody knows if the tag will have enough question – Dirty-flow Feb 19 '13 at 16:12
    
Dirty-flow: I agree that tag wikis are useful. I just disagree that worrying about the 2 rep is worth the time that could be spent making contributions to the site. – Linuxios Feb 19 '13 at 16:13

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .