Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

This will negatively affect me, as I have been awarded a "Famous Question" badge a few times, but mostly on questions that are older than 2 years old. For a page on a heavily-trafficked website to garner 10k views in a span of 2 or more years is hardly what I would consider "famous". I would think an element of time should be considered, like reached 10k views in a span of a month or even 6 months.

Yes, it will make the "Famous Question" badge harder to get, but it is a gold badge, after all, and a "Famous Question" will actually be "famous", rather than old enough to collect 10k views.

share|improve this question
I have 2 year old questions with only 200 views – juergen d Feb 19 '13 at 17:54
ha jeez, you meta guys are harsh. is it really that bad of a question? – Jason Feb 19 '13 at 17:55
Voting is different on meta – juergen d Feb 19 '13 at 17:56
@juergend thanks. as you can see i don't spend a whole lot of time here :) – Jason Feb 19 '13 at 17:57


Typically, when a question slowly accumulates 10k views over a period of time, it's because it is a high-ranking search engine hit. (aka Google bait)

These types of questions are especially important because they attract outside viewers who are actually searching for a specific answer to a problem. So they have long-term value and thus deserve the badge.

In short: I don't think we should be restricting the badge to questions that get viral spikes of attention early in their life.

share|improve this answer
But how is it famous if after a period of 3 or 4 years, it managed to accumulate 10k views? It just seems like if you post a question of relative appropriateness, eventually you will get a gold badge, regardless of how good the question actually is. – Jason Feb 19 '13 at 17:54
That's more of an argument for the misuse of the term "Famous". It could be renamed to something more accurate to what it's awarding. But that would be less intuitive. – Mysticial Feb 19 '13 at 17:56
I would think that "Famous" should represent something that reached a high level of popularity in a short period of time and something like a silver "Enduring" or "Classic" badge would be for questions that garner 10k votes after the "Famous" period is over. Maybe have a different gold badge for a question that got more than 10k votes in the post-famous time frame... "Everlasting Question" or something – Jason Feb 19 '13 at 17:59
@Jason While it makes more sense to split the badges, IMO, that's probably over-complicating the badge system. Shameless plug: I'd be more in favor of more gold answer badges. Since it's often the case where the asker gets 3 (Great, Famous, Stellar), and the answerer gets only 1 (Great). – Mysticial Feb 19 '13 at 18:11

We don't track view counts over time at this it's a non-starter from a technical standpoint. More than that, it complicates the badge with no visibility into the restrictions unless we also build a UI showing the view counts over time that you could's a lot of effort for a payoff that isn't there.

From a naming standpoint: thousands or tens of thousands of individuals have seen it...sounds famous to me.

share|improve this answer
I suggested a simple solution, that would not be a lot of effort to implement:… – rubo77 May 1 '14 at 21:47
@rubo77 That requires many things to happen, without fail, daily, and with a lot of storage in play. Really unless you know all the details "not a lot of effort" is a terrible assumption to make about any project you don't have deep first hand knowledge of. – Nick Craver May 1 '14 at 21:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .