Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I recently asked a question on SO that was related to Scrum as a development process (More productive Grooming Sessions), and it was closed within a day for being offtopic. A comment suggested that it would be a better fit for programmers.

Before asking the question on SO, I had a look and noticed that there were quite a few questions related to Scrum as a process, which received answers and were not closed:

Based on this, I thought that the question would be fine for SO and posted it.

Now looking again after the question was closed, I noticed that a good deal of the questions in the scrum tag (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/scrum) are closed for being offtopic.

It would be great to have a better detection of potentially offtopic questions when composing the question. If SO had told me that the question would probably a better fit for programmers, then I would have posted it there in the first place.

Wouldn't it make sense to detect questions with similar content and then see that a good percentage of them have been closed as being offtopic and then communicating that to the user?

share|improve this question
1  
Similar problem, different approach: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/117454/cross-site-asking – Gert Arnold Feb 21 '13 at 10:18

I think the major problem with such an idea is that there would be far too many false positives, making things extremely more difficult for users who are posting on-topic questions. Additionally, there would be way too many false-negatives, meaning it wouldn't be very useful, to begin with.

share|improve this answer
    
Oh, I absolutely agree, that's definitely a risk. – nwinkler Feb 21 '13 at 10:01
    
agreed .. we can not create enough intelligent robot at present .. or in other word AI is not yet developed at that level – NullPoiиteя Feb 21 '13 at 10:04
    
It still would be nice to have some more advanced guidance. Taking a look at the scrum tag is quite frustrating, with a good amount of the questions being closed as off-topic. If we could somehow avoid that ... – nwinkler Feb 21 '13 at 10:21

In most cases, you would still need actual people to assess whether the flag was indeed correct. Telling the user upfront that their question has an off-topic likelihood of 67.8% doesn't really say much.

Having said that, this idea may be useful to flag certain questions (just like posts of new users) for a potential "off-topic" review queue.

share|improve this answer

This is the reason why particular tags are removed - to stop people from selecting them. If you can't select a tag you want to use then it should be a clue that the question you're trying to ask is off-topic for the site.

If scrum questions (or any other topic that tends to get asked incorrectly) are off-topic for the site then the better approach is to request that tag itself be removed rather than blocking all questions that refer to it in the question text.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .