Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I recently posted a question, instantly refreshed, and it seemed like I had one vote before anyone would have had time to see it.

Was this coincidence or do users with a higher reputation start their questions with > 0 votes?

share|improve this question
Obviously the downvote is an attempt at some sort of counter proof. – sdasdadas Feb 25 '13 at 20:38
That is not a counter proof. You only have 126 reps here. That is very little. So your questions automatically get two downvotes right from the get-go. – ЯegDwight Feb 25 '13 at 20:41
I was only asking about high reputation users - penalizing low reputation would be ridiculous (since it affects me). – sdasdadas Feb 25 '13 at 20:42
1. Giving a bonus to high rep users is penalizing low reputation. 2. What do you mean, downvotes affect you but upvotes do not? 3. My original statement was quite obviously a joke. So that's like a triple whoosh or something. – ЯegDwight Feb 25 '13 at 20:54
As was mine but maybe text isn't the best medium. And I meant that the a rule for low reputation would affect me. – sdasdadas Feb 25 '13 at 20:58
"Why do rich people have all the money?". Could it be that people who get lots of upvotes somehow end up with a high reputation? – Bo Persson Feb 25 '13 at 22:52
It wasn't that - it was the speed at which I noticed it. I thought, maybe, it might be some side effect to having a high reputation. – sdasdadas Feb 25 '13 at 22:57
up vote 4 down vote accepted

I don't believe there's any stats that prove this (and I still don't understand the Stack Exchange Data explorer enough to compose a query) either way; but it seems reasonable that questions from users with 'high rep' might attract more interest, simply because those users are expected to know a great deal more than others without that level of reputation.

Also, it's entirely possible, that people are more forgiving of stylistic/grammatical errors in high-rep users' questions, since they've already 'proven' themselves and their understanding of, and commitment to the site; and any misunderstandings made might be ascribed to their superior knowledge (if John Skeet posts a question with a misunderstanding I'm unlikely to know better, after all).

Therefore the questions may be opened with a presumption of an interesting question, though I, personally, take the time to read a question before voting (either up or down).

share|improve this answer
Another item to consider adding to your list: It's also possible that people with higher reputation are better at forming good questions due to their significant experience at it here. – Andrew Barber Feb 25 '13 at 21:47

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .