Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I was just on the Suggested Edits tab, and noticed this edit. It is obviously not valid, and I rejected it. However, it was approved by two people (one a new reviewer, the other somewhat new). I then went to the question and took it back out. Was I right to do this, or have our tag-in-title rules changed?

share|improve this question
up vote 10 down vote accepted

No, that's was a useless edit. It should not have been approved. I'm surprised it was.

Tags already appear in the <title> of the question, and should not be added to the actual question title. The correct action would be Reject, reason: Custom -> "Don't put tags in titles" or "too minor" if you don't feel like typing.

The edit merely appended [python] to the existing title and changed nothing else:

Comment: added python to title to help people searching through the titles

conditional keypress via command line [python]

I can't comment on the motive of the edit, as there may be something to it (although you really should just use tags to search in a language, not titles). If you really honestly feel you must use a tag in a title, do it in a natural way. For a (bad, unnecessary) example:

Conditional keypress via command line in Python

...still, usually you shouldn't do this.

share|improve this answer
Indeed; it would more likely be a valid edit to remove a tag from a title! – Andrew Barber Feb 26 '13 at 2:45
Thanks for the quick answer. – Linuxios Feb 26 '13 at 2:57
One of the reviewers is apparently a ColdFusion dev, so his judgement might be a little scrambled. – Wesley Murch Feb 26 '13 at 2:58
Also note that one of the reviewers is the author of the original post, hence why the edit was approved. – Emmett Feb 26 '13 at 3:00
@Wesley the other reviewer reviewed it first (hover over the times to see the exact time in a tooltip) – Emmett Feb 26 '13 at 3:03
@Emmett Just saw that, it was like .5 seconds difference between the reviews. Originally I read it wrong, that the author approved it first. – Wesley Murch Feb 26 '13 at 3:03

It puzzled me why there were only 2 approve votes, and ironically - it got approved from the OP... So, I guess the OP is relatively new, or thought it was a good edit, and the other reviewer is just new... But I agree, the edit shouldn't have been approved, but then the OP's approval is final!

share|improve this answer
Really? That was the OP (the new one or the newish one?) – Linuxios Feb 26 '13 at 2:56
@Linuxios jml approved the edit to his own post... Although with 500 rep, that seems a bit odd... but yeah... – Jon Clements Feb 26 '13 at 2:58
OP's vote on suggested edits is final: Can a question's OP approve suggested edits on the question? /cc @Linuxios – Josh Caswell Feb 26 '13 at 2:59
@JoshCaswell: Alright. Makes sense. – Linuxios Feb 26 '13 at 3:15
@JonClements: It does. Why he would be in the queue, for the first time, for an edit on his question... I'm gonna do some looking. – Linuxios Feb 26 '13 at 3:16
@linuxios You get notified when an edit has been made to your post... They may have clicked onto that – Jon Clements Feb 26 '13 at 3:17
@Linuxios: You get notifications for edits (suggested or completed) on your post; there's also an indicator on the "edit" link below the post itself. – Josh Caswell Feb 26 '13 at 3:17
@JoshCaswell, JonClements: Forgot that. Thanks. – Linuxios Feb 26 '13 at 3:18

It seems a little silly to me - I wouldn't have approved it, personally. But then again, unfortunately many people seem to just approve things without really giving much thought.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .