Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I just saw this question on the interesting tab.

Why does my cat suddenly start following me around once I put on my aphrodisiac lotion?

It was blatant that it was a joke (attempt) from the title, and the trending tag choice.

It would be nice to flag this question with out giving the OP the satisfaction of clicking into it.

share|improve this question
Oh yeah, and that wouldn't get abused at all. – animuson Feb 27 '13 at 3:44
Although yes, these trolls are annoying, as @animuson wrote, this will be a "judge a book by its cover" type of abuse. – A--C Feb 27 '13 at 3:47
If the user is indeed a troll (as all evidence indicates), the downvote, rather than the view, is exactly the satisfaction he's looking for anyway. – David Robinson Feb 27 '13 at 3:52
Oops, I forgot to downvote before voting to delete! – Josh Caswell Feb 27 '13 at 3:52

Since it's blatantly a troll, I don't think there's any harm clicking on it, as its view count isn't exactly going to be around for long. Besides, it could be someone just vandalised a completely valid post, and one wouldn't know with out looking.

On a sidenote, the same poster had deleted (it's just quoting from Romeo and Juliet) - so it looks like they're abusing the site...

share|improve this answer
Probing the question ban algorithm? – Josh Caswell Feb 27 '13 at 3:53
ah vandals. Yeah, I wouldn't like it very much if my question was butchered and then closed as a result of it. – Jesse Black Feb 27 '13 at 4:51
@Maudicus The summary of questions is confusing as well as to the name of the person - it's either the OP, an edit, or last person to answer... So without looking at it to get the context of edits/answers etc... I could see your suggestion leading to trouble. – Jon Clements Feb 27 '13 at 4:53

No, this feature is not a good idea.

A lot of question titles don't address or summarize the actual question very well, making this feature open to abuse.

You are supposed to read at least most of a question before you flag. Flagging based on the title alone is a very bad idea and will likely create more useless and wrong flags that the moderators will have to deal with.

What harm can there be in opening the question before flagging it? The question will eventually get deleted (quite possibly the user too) and no one will ever know, except maybe 10k users.

share|improve this answer
I didn't use the feature tag... just wanted to discuss the question and bring the users behavior to more people's attention. I don't take back that I would have flagged that question from the interesting feed and would have taken great satisfaction in doing so. – Jesse Black Feb 27 '13 at 4:29
The point is, you shouldn't be able to flag something without looking at it. – ɥʇǝS Feb 28 '13 at 1:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .