What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

This question already has an answer here:

When I want to start a new line, I've always used <br>. I'm wondering if there's a better way, however, that only uses Markdown. I'm aware that if you insert two line breaks, leaving a blank line, it works, like this:

But what if I don't want a blank line like you see above this line? I don't have a problem with using <br>, but it just seems like such a common task shouldn't require four extra characters when Markdown is supported.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Eliah Kagan, Arjan, Martijn Pieters, hims056, Tobias Kienzler Aug 13 '13 at 8:13

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

2  
Double space is for you. And you probably need to look at Markdown help –  hims056 Feb 27 '13 at 6:55
5  
You shouldn't ever need to start a new line, really. Splitting paragraphs with line breaks makes sense for prose, IMO, but on Stack Exchange? I don't know. –  slhck Feb 27 '13 at 7:22
4  
You shouldn't force newlines, except possibly when you're writing a poem. In all other cases, you should force a new paragraph. –  balpha Feb 27 '13 at 8:07
    
I agree with balpha and slhck why force a line break. –  dragonloverlord Apr 15 '13 at 15:31
    
Yes. It's called <br/>. –  Cole Johnson Aug 13 '13 at 6:41
1  
In case you think you need line breaks, then please read about the difference between a line break and a paragraph. –  Arjan Aug 13 '13 at 6:48
    
@slhck I use new lines in a good 50% of my answers in the form bold paragraph title [new line] paragraph. For example here:stackoverflow.com/questions/17907255/… –  Richard Tingle Aug 13 '13 at 10:29
1  
@RichardTingle That is very unusual formatting and not according to any style guide, or proper HTML semantics either. What you're doing is putting a pseudo-heading into a paragraph, while instead you should use an HTML heading element like <h1> through <h3>. –  slhck Aug 13 '13 at 10:34
    
@slhck aren't html elements workarounds, for use only where markdown is unavailable (eg ** are preferable to <b></b> except as a workaround for intraword emphasis). –  Richard Tingle Aug 13 '13 at 10:37
    
@RichardTingle You can use # through ### to create the headings. I edited your post to give you an example. –  slhck Aug 13 '13 at 10:39
    
@slhck thats actually very nice. I'll look into using that –  Richard Tingle Aug 13 '13 at 10:48
    
Also, @Richard, using headings (or at least paragraphs) is so much nicer for people using screen readers. Now the screen reader understands it's a heading, not just some random bold text in a sentence. (Lacking the dot, "Conceptual implementation So you create a branching structure" was really just one sentence, regardless of the explicit line break.) –  Arjan Aug 17 '13 at 8:19

2 Answers 2

up vote 12 down vote accepted

You can add two trailing spaces to the end of the line:

This is a sentence
followed by a newline

Where:

This is a sentence    
------------------^^
share|improve this answer
    
Where is this stuff documented? –  Cole Johnson Aug 13 '13 at 6:40
    
Documented, in the Markdown help, @Cole, but not recommended. Strangely enough, the blank line for a paragraph is not in that official documentation. –  Arjan Aug 13 '13 at 6:47

Yes, you can, end your line with two spaces:

This is my line
broken without <br>

This is my line
Broken without <br>

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you too. I would accept this, but I wasn't sure which one was posted first (they both said 18 minutes ago) and (no offense) Jon Clements' post was more clear. –  flarn2006 Feb 27 '13 at 7:16
    
@flarn2006 if you mouse over the timestamp text, you get more detailed time information. Also if you mouse over the share links, you can see the post id (the first number) - these are issued in strict chronological order. So you can see that this post was made ten seconds before the other. But I wouldn't worry about it :) –  AakashM Feb 27 '13 at 8:54

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .