Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

The tag , according to its wiki and excerpt is perfectly fine.

But, in the language, the arrays the tables are defined as:

The table type implements associative arrays. An associative array is an array that can be indexed not only with numbers, but also with strings or any other value of the language, except nil.

Now, in my opinion, using would be fine in this case, but recently, I noticed a question using table as a tag.

My question is, what should be done for such conflicting tags? There might be more of these depending on what language they might pop from.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Martijn Pieters, ɥʇǝS, CRABOLO, nicael, Shadow Wizard Oct 10 '14 at 19:26

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Martijn Pieters, ɥʇǝS, CRABOLO, nicael, Shadow Wizard
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Related: Retag the [html] + [table] questions to [html-table] - The table tag really shouldn't exist. – animuson Mar 3 '13 at 21:21
@animuson But table is the only name given to arrays in Lua. – hjpotter92 Mar 3 '13 at 21:25
I'm just saying it's ambiguous. If you really need a "table" tag for Lua, it should be named lua-table, otherwise use array. But the table tag is way too ambiguous to be useful. – animuson Mar 3 '13 at 21:27
@animuson It is useful, even if it is used in different contexts. Just think of [lua]+[table] as the same as [lua-table], and [html]+[table] as [html-table]. What is not useful are of course the statistics for such tag, but TBH, who cares? – yo' Mar 3 '13 at 23:00
@tohecz: Based on that argument, every ambiguous tag in existence is useful. – animuson Mar 3 '13 at 23:08
@animuson That's how I see it :-/ Tags do not form a "tree" – yo' Mar 3 '13 at 23:14
Why tag it all with table or lua-table? Shouldn't lua suffice? – Brian Mar 7 '13 at 18:38