This review was recently reviewed by the Community ♦ user and accepted. I thought this edit may have been a honey-pot but it wasn't.

I think Community needs a bit of time in the naughty corner.... if it wasn't for the user strah correcting it then we would have one ugly looking question on our hands.

Should the Community ♦ user be making decisions like this? Can it be improved?

enter image description here

share|improve this question
@Kevin: So there is no bug? I find it strange that there was no record of Strah improving the suggested edit. –  Martijn Pieters Mar 5 '13 at 22:56
@MartijnPieters Because he improved from outside the review queue it's the correct behavior, improving from within the queue would have given him "review credit" as expected. –  Kevin Montrose Mar 5 '13 at 22:58
Right, so be came to the edit via the edit (1) link then; that's the detail I was missing here! :-) –  Martijn Pieters Mar 5 '13 at 23:01
There is a record (2nd Revision in this page) Revision History –  escist Mar 7 '13 at 9:37
add comment

1 Answer

Strah choose to improve the suggested edit but left the 'helpful' checkbox checked. I'll be charitable and suggest that that was accidental. However, he did so outside of the review queue, using the edit (1) link directly on the question itself instead.

Community is attributed 'helpful' accepts (example 1, 2), just as it is attributed 'not helpful' rejections. This is not always the case, like this edit for example, was also improved by Strah, and it is simply marked as approved. Community was not involved there; I think because the post was edited by a 3rd party between suggestion and review action there.

But take a look at the timestamps. Community 'accepted' the suggested edit at 09:34:49, and strah's edit was at 09:34:49. Ergo, Community accepted the suggested edit because Strah improved it and left the checkbox marked.

Normally, when done through the review queue, such improvements also are recorded as a review action; 'Edit' in this case. But because the edit was made outside of the queue, the only record of this is the approval attributed to Community, and the 'improved' edit by Strah in the post revision history.

share|improve this answer
Would that not show up in the suggested edit history as an improve event? –  Bart Mar 5 '13 at 9:54
@Bart: The timestamps match exactly with the accept. –  Martijn Pieters Mar 5 '13 at 9:54
Yeah, it was my first idea as well, but I seem to remember that it would actually show up in the history as such...let's see if I can find one of mine... –  Bart Mar 5 '13 at 9:56
For example this one where I edited and, from what I recall, marked it as not helpful. It states "Edit" as my action...still, I think you're right. –  Bart Mar 5 '13 at 10:00
@Bart: There is something interesting going on here, possibly a bug, actually. There is no record of strah reviewing it indeed, not on the suggested edit, nor on in the review history (link to history page is very localized). –  Martijn Pieters Mar 5 '13 at 10:03
If the above is the case, it looks like a weird bug since it is not showing strah's edit in review page. Ideally it should have shown as strah reviewed ... : Edit –  iDev Mar 5 '13 at 10:03
@ACB: Exactly. I think this is actually a bug in the recording of the suggested edit. –  Martijn Pieters Mar 5 '13 at 10:03
An example of approved edit –  hims056 Mar 5 '13 at 10:09
@hims056: I just added such a reference for Strah to my answer. This is a curious case indeed. –  Martijn Pieters Mar 5 '13 at 10:10
@hims056: But I found counter examples as well; community approving suggested edits after an improve action. –  Martijn Pieters Mar 5 '13 at 10:30
@Bart: I found some examples of Community approving edits where a reviewer choose 'improve' then left the checkbox checked. Still, curious case. –  Martijn Pieters Mar 5 '13 at 10:31
@MartijnPieters Time for the Wheel of Blame I'd say. –  Bart Mar 5 '13 at 10:37
@MartijnPieters is right. I have edited (I've chosen Improve option) the suggested edit and left the checkbox edit was helpful untouched (ticked by default). Strangely, this doesn't show in my reviews history. –  strah Mar 5 '13 at 10:37
@strah: Thanks for the confirmation! The plot thickens. :-) –  Martijn Pieters Mar 5 '13 at 10:41
@hims056: Note that in your case, Community approved the edit. :-) –  Martijn Pieters Mar 5 '13 at 10:42
show 1 more comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .