Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

This question already has an answer here:

I know this question has appeared several times, but as I do not find a proper explanation I want to show my case:

  • I suggested an edit on tag excerpt because there was a typo.
  • The edit was approved by two users
  • Community user rejected it
  • Another user edited what I had suggested
  • I got a "rejected" message

This is the case:

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Martijn Pieters, Bo Persson, BinaryMisfit, ben is uǝq backwards, Bart Mar 6 '13 at 16:24

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

minitech is not a moderator (yet). – Martijn Pieters Mar 6 '13 at 16:11
minitech did far more than fix that simple typo. – J. Steen Mar 6 '13 at 16:12
@J.Steen . My suggested edit was for the whole tag: excerpt and text, but it somehow was split in two different suggestions. – fedorqui Mar 6 '13 at 16:15
FYI, this is the full edit Minitech made: – Bart Mar 6 '13 at 16:15
And also a dupe of How do suggested edits work? – Martijn Pieters Mar 6 '13 at 16:16
@fedorqui You stated in your question "suggested edit on tag alias excerpt", so I focused on that. =) – J. Steen Mar 6 '13 at 16:23
The reviewer thought there was more to fix so considered your edit as too minor; can't judge him for that. – Shadow Wizard Mar 6 '13 at 16:25
It happened again! – fedorqui Mar 13 '13 at 9:32
up vote 2 down vote accepted

When presented with a suggested edit a reviewer has four options

  • They can accept it, giving it one vote to accept,
  • reject it, giving it a vote to reject,
  • they can improve it, which allows them to edit the post based on your revision,
  • or they can skip the edit entirely.

When improving a post the reviewer has the option of specifying if the suggested edit was helpful, if they say it was, it is approved, if they say it wasn't it is rejected. The Community user does the actual approving/rejecting because his vote is binding.

share|improve this answer
Thanks, @Servy. Now it makes sense to me. What I do not understand is why he marked it as rejected. Of course it was just a tiny thing what I suggested, but it was in the good direction. – fedorqui Mar 6 '13 at 16:55
@fedorqui clearly he felt it was too minor of an edit. – Servy Mar 6 '13 at 16:56
@fedorqui: because your edit was too minor; when suggesting edits, you need to fix more than just a typo, please. – Martijn Pieters Mar 6 '13 at 16:56
OK. I would state that it is not bad to correct typos, but can also be seen as a good way to make you improve the article whenever you want to correct tiny things. Thanks people (although all down votes I received). – fedorqui Mar 6 '13 at 16:59

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .