What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 128 Stack Exchange communities.

I registered on math.se only to post an answer to this question:

What was the first bit of mathematics that made you realize that math is beautiful? (For children's book)

but since its a protected question, I am not allowed to answer it, (I found this info from here: What is a “protected” question? ).

NOTE: I can comment on the above question, just not post an answer.

I thought that the point of association bonus was to bypass those limits, why isn't that the case for answering protected questions?

share|improve this question
Ack, that sounds like a horrible question to answer anyways...you could write a blog entry on the topic though. –  user7116 Mar 8 '13 at 16:34

1 Answer 1

up vote 14 down vote accepted

The association bonus is ignored explicitly to prevent people from other sites with no experience with the site they just joined up at from putting their oar in.

For protected questions, you are expected to have experience on the target site itself. Experience at other sites is not enough.

To give an example: just because you know how to code in JavaScript doesn't mean you know how to answer a protected question on the Islam site.

share|improve this answer
Then the notification text displayed should account for this, as it is the text says "This question is protected to prevent 'thanks!', 'me too!', or spam answers by new users. To answer it, you must have earned at least 10 reputation on this site". A veteran user from any site would know not to do these things, so if they're being blocked for other reasons, the reason should be more clear. –  zzzzBov Dec 6 '13 at 19:19
The association bonus is not something you earned on this site. –  Martijn Pieters Dec 6 '13 at 19:19
I'm not arguing about the reputation, I'm arguing that the description is misleading. Telling a new user that they can't post "thanks" or "me to" style answers makes sense because they don't have experience with the StackExchange network, but when a user has enough rep to get the association bonus they would typically have enough experience to not do these things on any SE site. If the reason is because the user is too new to have provable experience with the subject at hand, the descriptions should be changed to indicate it. –  zzzzBov Dec 6 '13 at 19:22
If you feel strongly enough about that, perhaps you could make that a feature request. :-) –  Martijn Pieters Dec 6 '13 at 19:26
I only hit this question because I was bit by the protected question message, and didn't understand why my 101 rep on a site wasn't sufficient to answer a question that's blocked at 10 rep. I'm sure I'll be able to earn the 10 rep on that site easily enough, but I think I will take your advice and open a feature request to add clarity. –  zzzzBov Dec 6 '13 at 19:30
@MartijnPieters The messages on various pages of individual stackexchange sites do explicitly express that the association bonus does indeed get earned on the new sites a user is signing up for. –  Tom Pace Apr 6 at 7:23
Well, I do have a problem with it. The purpose this answer gives has nothing to do the purpose stated for locking, which is to avoid "me, too" style answers. If you've gotten 200 points on any Stack Exchange site, you know that those types of answers are bad. The current state of affairs lies twice to us, first when we get the 200 points, as we are not trusted to know how to use the site as claimed, and at the point where we are told we need at least 10 points, which we already have. Locks are not supposed to be about expertise, but about the ability to write an answer. –  trlkly Jul 16 at 1:21

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .