Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

This question already has an answer here:

I came across a question yesterday that consisted of a single sentence (with poor grammar to boot), followed by a load of poorly formatted code. I flagged it as low quality and it has since received two down votes. Was I wrong to flag this as a low quality question?

It seemed to fit the description of low quality ("This question has severe formatting or content problems. This question is unlikely to be salvageable through editing, and might need to be removed.") perfectly. I could spend a few minutes reformatting the messy code, but the tags are wrong and the actual question shows no effort at all. Simply cleaning up the code wouldn't have made the question any more understandable.

I'm just curious if I was wrong to flag it as such and what fits the description more appropriately?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by hims056, Lucifer, Martijn Pieters, wax eagle, Manishearth Jun 14 '13 at 13:47

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

If the post was edited since you flagged it the flag is declined automatically. – Martijn Pieters Mar 8 '13 at 15:37
The message says "declined - a moderator reviewed your flag, but found no evidence to support it" – j08691 Mar 8 '13 at 15:39

I declined your flag. Since you've brought this up, I'll answer here as to why:

The question is not very low quality. Yes, it has issues, but it's not so far gone that a moderator should intervene.

It needs a little cleanup, to be sure, but looking at it, there's no action I would take other than cleaning it up through editing.

Remember, Moderators are human exception handlers, and flags to us should be treated as something only we can fix. In this case, you could certainly edit the question, or clean it up if it's your subject area.

We've been given a directive to be more stringent in flags we accept. Your flag could have been helpful otherwise, but not as a 'very low quality' flag.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the reply. Normally I would attempt to clean up a question like this, but after looking at it I realized that even if I cleaned up the code, the question still pretty musch sucked. – j08691 Mar 8 '13 at 15:46
@j08691 if you had flagged it as 'not a real question', I could have possibly seen that as being helpful (though I still wouldn't have closed it; in this case I would have marked the flag as helpful). Don't worry about one flag being declined; but do start worrying if lots of your flags are declined. – George Stocker Mar 8 '13 at 15:54

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .