Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I have seen some references to the term, "ragequit". Being somewhat new to SO, I am intrigued. What exactly does ragequitting entail?

share|improve this question
7  
Just google it. It's not specific to SO/SE. – Mysticial Mar 13 '13 at 0:32
2  
It's when I downvote some of your posts on Stack Overflow and you get so angry that someone dared to vote down your gems, that you email team@se and request deletion of your account on Parenting to teach them basterds a lesson :) – Lorem Ipsum Mar 13 '13 at 0:36
up vote 30 down vote accepted

Rage quitting is when a user gets extremely angry about something—probably trivial—then goes on a rage and makes malicious edits, deletes their useful content, etc.

And then quits.

It creates a lot of work for the moderators to un-do the damage, and as a result there are mechanisms in place to try to mitigate the damages: edits cause a question to bump up in the relevant active pages, you can't delete more than 5 of your posts in one day, etc.

share|improve this answer
    
a/ this "limitation" needs to disappear for high-rep users, as I request in meta.stackexchange.com/questions/129634/…. b/ This limitation doesn't prevent malicious edits anyway (meta.stackexchange.com/a/171560/6309) – VonC Mar 13 '13 at 8:00
    
@VonC - I don't have a strong opinion on this either way, especially with the awesome workaround in your second link. That said, I do believe there have been known instances of 10 and 20K+ users rage quitting, so I'm not sure blanket-trusting all users by rep would entirely eliminate this concern / problem. – Adam Rackis Mar 13 '13 at 14:54
    
blanket-trusting all users? How about 200K+ users ;-) ? And no, there are, for now, no known instance of rage-quiting for high-rep users: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/129634/… – VonC Mar 13 '13 at 15:47
    
@VonC - interesting. Yeah, I think they could probably loosen up some of the rules with minimal risk. – Adam Rackis Mar 13 '13 at 16:16

It just means that someone gets really angry during a game/argument/etc so they just rage at everyone and then leave.

share|improve this answer

In the context of SO, I suppose it would mean that a user is enraged or angry at something about SO and decided to never ask/answer at SO again.

Needless to say, it's a bad idea.

share|improve this answer
8  
In SO, it's often specific to users who delete or vandalize their own content before quitting. – David Robinson Mar 13 '13 at 0:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .