What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

What is the tag for? It looks like a candidate for burnination - touches:

Seems like an incohesive mess.


Is in the same ballpark? (only 7 questions...)

share|improve this question
5  
Before y'all bring out your bazookas, there is a legitimate use for the pure tag –  Lorem Ipsum Mar 13 '13 at 23:28
4  
Languages with odd names tend to get tags ending in "lang". pure-lang is probably the best thing to retag relevant questions with. –  Charles Mar 13 '13 at 23:33
    
@Lorem: any actual questions that use this tag in that context? –  Martijn Pieters Mar 13 '13 at 23:38
    
@MartijnPieters I don't know; I'm not going tag diving now. Just leaving a hint/warning for those that want to... –  Lorem Ipsum Mar 13 '13 at 23:43
    
@LoremIpsum - So far I'm seeing more of the Pure HTML/JSON templating framework than I am of that language. –  Richard JP Le Guen Mar 14 '13 at 2:32

2 Answers 2

I've gone through more than half of the questions formerly tagged , removing the label when it was clearly not necessary:

  • Thinigs like "pure HTML", "pure CSS", "pure JS", "pure Java", "pure Python", "pure Lua" I just removed it.
  • In instances of "pure virtual" questions, I changed it to

I took a chance and changed some tags from to either or . In some instances of questions about Fortran I changed it to and left a comment asking if my change makes sense.

I left several questions as-is, as I didn't feel I knew enough about the following topics (or technologies) to edit them:

  • The Pure HTML/JSON templating system
  • The Pure programming language
  • "Pure pointer notation"
  • Haskall concepts: "Pure Functional Programming"; "Pure Global Variable"; "Pure Computation"
  • The "Pure Java API" - is this a thing?
  • C++ pure_assert_impl
  • C# Pure code contracts
  • C++ pure/const
share|improve this answer

It is mostly being used as a meta tag:

But there is some non-meta use as well:

If you retag the questions in that last category, then you should burn it.

share|improve this answer
2  
.Net has a [Pure] annotation as a code contract, the language D has a pure keyword and wikipedia recognizes "pure virtual functions" as a C++ concept. Those are non-meta as well, I think. –  madth3 Mar 13 '13 at 23:29
    
Not sure if all those deserve a tag though; if there are dedicated tags for them, use those instead, otherwise just remove the pure tag from those. –  Martijn Pieters Mar 13 '13 at 23:35
3  
@madth3 - Then perhaps less generic (and less mistakable) tags are needed - pure-virtual-functions for example, instead of just pure –  Richard JP Le Guen Mar 14 '13 at 0:22
    
Edited the question in category #2 –  Richard JP Le Guen Mar 14 '13 at 0:23
    
Looks like there's already a pure-virtual tag meant for pure virtual functions. –  Richard JP Le Guen Mar 14 '13 at 2:29

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .