Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I've been reviewing a few Suggested Edits this morning on SO and I've noticed that one guy has gone through a couple of answers involving "StartSSL", editing them to include:

Here is how to get a free SSL certificate with StartSSL: http://[user's own blog].org/2013/03/17/get-a-free-ssl-certificate-with-startssl/.

The blog in question does indeed feature a valid tutorial. Is this tolerated or should these edits be rejected? For now I've simply skipped them as I wasn't too sure.

http://stackoverflow.com/review/suggested-edits/1734812
http://stackoverflow.com/review/suggested-edits/1734814

share|improve this question
up vote 9 down vote accepted

It should be rejected, because the linked content could not match the intention of the post's original author.

He should have posted it in a separate answer, and disclosed his affiliation with the blog.

share|improve this answer
2  
Without any substantive instructions besides the link, it wouldn't be appropriate as another answer either. (It would be a link-only answer.) – Eliah Kagan Mar 17 '13 at 10:03
    
Yes, obviously. – Rob W Mar 17 '13 at 10:04
    
Note: These questions should also be closed. (Deleting them would also remove the reputation he got from the bad approvals.) ;) – animuson Mar 17 '13 at 15:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .