I've been reviewing a few Suggested Edits this morning on SO and I've noticed that one guy has gone through a couple of answers involving "StartSSL", editing them to include:

Here is how to get a free SSL certificate with StartSSL: http://[user's own blog].org/2013/03/17/get-a-free-ssl-certificate-with-startssl/.

The blog in question does indeed feature a valid tutorial. Is this tolerated or should these edits be rejected? For now I've simply skipped them as I wasn't too sure.


share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 9 down vote accepted

It should be rejected, because the linked content could not match the intention of the post's original author.

He should have posted it in a separate answer, and disclosed his affiliation with the blog.

share|improve this answer
Without any substantive instructions besides the link, it wouldn't be appropriate as another answer either. (It would be a link-only answer.) –  Eliah Kagan Mar 17 '13 at 10:03
Yes, obviously. –  Rob W Mar 17 '13 at 10:04
Note: These questions should also be closed. (Deleting them would also remove the reputation he got from the bad approvals.) ;) –  animuson Mar 17 '13 at 15:49
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .