What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 150 Stack Exchange communities.

Would it be possible to get a Not a dupe flag, for questions which have been closed as duplicate?

Every now and again I'll see a question that are completely different, and definitely not dupes.

A new flag would save me typing in the Other box every time.

share|improve this question
I can see potential for misuse. Perhaps it should only be available to say... 2K+ users? – Prof Pickle Mar 18 '13 at 8:27
And perhaps it could be called... "vote to reopen". ;) – J. Steen Mar 18 '13 at 8:28
@J.Steen If you're saying that something like this already exists, I don't see the option: i.imgur.com/Fr2CKnf.png If you're just suggesting the name, I like it. – Danny Beckett Mar 18 '13 at 8:31
@DannyBeckett You don't have that privilege yet i.imgur.com/fqq1WBU.png – Bart Mar 18 '13 at 8:32
@DannyBeckett It's a feature available to 3k+ users - at the same time they get the ability to cast close-votes. Sorry, I have a habit of being overly sarcastic before I've had my morning coffee. =) – J. Steen Mar 18 '13 at 8:32
@Bart Nice! ...but a flag would still be good for <3k users ;) – Danny Beckett Mar 18 '13 at 8:33
@DannyBeckett: Flag > Other works just fine. (And it's 3k for close privs.) – Mat Mar 18 '13 at 8:34
@Mat Okay, I give in... can somebody write an answer? – Danny Beckett Mar 18 '13 at 8:35
@DannyBeckett Would you downvote me as well if I answered this? Given that it's essentially what Nullpointer told you to do? – Bart Mar 18 '13 at 8:36
@Bart Maybe... depends if you tell me to write it in Other ;) But seriously, if J.Steen's comment can be converted, that's a good answer. Edit: Too bad I can't downvote Back in a Flash's answer for the same reason. No votes left today. – Danny Beckett Mar 18 '13 at 8:37
Suppose there will be such flag option. You will still have to explain why it's not a dupe, you can't expect moderators to spend their time trying to figure out themselves. So this pretty much renders the "save me typing" irrelevant. Bottom line: can't see any reason to have this in place. – Shadow Wizard Mar 18 '13 at 8:51
@ShaWizDowArd Yeah that's a fair point... – Danny Beckett Mar 18 '13 at 8:51

3 Answers 3

up vote 8 down vote accepted

The "vote to reopen" feature already exists, and is available to users with 3000 reputation or more. You get it bundled in the privilege to cast votes - be it to close or reopen.

Before that, all you can do is as you've done up until now; flag, and write a clear explanation in the Others field.

share|improve this answer

This is exactly why we have reopen votes. If a question is closed (by mistake/oversight) users with the privilege can vote to reopen the question. On (Meta) Stack Overflow you will need a reputation >3k to obtain this privilege.

Until then you can just use a custom flag if you really feel a big mistake has been made. Simply go for the "Other" option and clearly describe the situation. ("Not a dupe" is not enough ;) )

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the answer Bart! Unfortunately can't upvote until tomorrow. – Danny Beckett Mar 18 '13 at 8:47
@DannyBeckett I'll do it for you. ;) – J. Steen Mar 18 '13 at 8:50
Cheers @J.Steen ! – Danny Beckett Mar 18 '13 at 8:51

You can flag such closed question; and add custom comment in the needs moderator attention section.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .