Personally I'm getting completely fed up with SO lately. It is both heaven and hell in one place.

I'm guessing at least 6 of the 10 questions posted will be either deleted due to low quality, or duplicates because people tend to post here before using Google..

Wouldn't it be a good idea to have questions from users with lets say under 100 reputation reviewed before they are actually published on the site?

share|improve this question
    
SO, or Meta.SO? –  tombull89 Mar 20 '13 at 9:30
2  
Isn't that why this has been built? –  hjpotter92 Mar 20 '13 at 9:31
    
@BackinaFlash Yes, but it is definitely not covering the fact that the newest-questions are completely full of spam-questions.. –  Rob Mar 20 '13 at 9:34
add comment

1 Answer

Post of new users are already reviewed in the review queue's. Although they are directly posted.

And some are closed during the review.

share|improve this answer
    
But the tools when reviewing don't help They dom't not show linked questions so hard to spot a dup. ALso the don't allow time for the user to respond to a comment requesting clarification or a change –  Mark Mar 20 '13 at 11:18
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .