What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 127 Stack Exchange communities.

I believe is a meta tag for Stack Overflow with 161 posts. Should it be burninated as the tag can’t work as the only tag on any post?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Undo, Martijn Pieters, Shadow Wizard, 3ventic, random May 13 at 19:59

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Undo, Martijn Pieters, Shadow Wizard, 3ventic, random
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

12  
I'm ambiguous about this request... I now feel better, and a little ashamed of myself... –  ben is uǝq backwards Mar 20 '13 at 14:31
1  
I'd disambiguate this as an explicit burnination-request. As it currently stand's, it looks too much like a question to which the answer could be "no". –  Joachim Sauer Mar 20 '13 at 14:37
1  
I'm ambiguous about the tag; when using AI techniques, you'll have to deal with ambiguity and I can see that for such questions the tag has a place. The tag is overused, though, but I don't see the need to burniate it indiscriminately. –  Martijn Pieters Mar 20 '13 at 14:40
    
Withholding my +1 for the lack of Trogdor. (Not really!) –  Andrew's a Unitato Mar 20 '13 at 14:41
    
I see dead people. Wait, wrong website... –  casperOne Mar 20 '13 at 15:10
1  
I would throw ambiguous in there as well, and maybe even ambiguous-call –  Richard J. Ross III Mar 20 '13 at 16:48
    
@RichardJ.RossIII: well, I wouldn't call ambiguous-call all that ambiguous. –  Joachim Sauer Mar 21 '13 at 9:18
add comment

5 Answers

The fact that a question has the tag doesn't tell anyone anything. And since you can't possibly be an expert at ambiguous questions, nobody is going to follow that tag (well, except one). It should be removed.

Or, if there is a particular use case in which the tag will make sense (e.g. in AI techniques), then the tag wiki should reflect that very clearly and all questions that are not about that topic should have their tag removed.

share|improve this answer
    
Speak for yourself; I'm an expert at ambiguous questions. –  Lightness Races in Orbit Mar 20 '13 at 16:07
    
Im not sure if I'm an expert in ambiguous questions - its not entirely clear to me if I am or not, its kind of.... –  Jamiec Mar 20 '13 at 16:08
add comment

At first it seems is itself an ambiguous tag.

It seems like tagging something with .

But actually it's not like that. Ambiguity is, dictionary: "uncertainty or inexactness" -- in code ambiguity is the name of a specific problem where things are inexact or imprecise. The tag is all about this problem.

That said, it isn't that useful a tag, imo

share|improve this answer
add comment

Ambiguity is a term used a lot in Natural Language Processing.

I would make sure the tag, is on the relevant questions, then burn .

share|improve this answer
1  
word-sense-disambiguation is more confusing than ambiguity IMO. –  Richard J. Ross III Mar 20 '13 at 16:45
1  
@RichardJ.RossIII, It may not always be used right, but it is a precise technical term. –  Lance Roberts Mar 20 '13 at 16:50
1  
@RichardJ.RossIII: more confusing? probably only if you're not into that area (NLP). But it's definitely more specific and therefore more tag-worthy. It's not a meta-tag. –  Joachim Sauer Mar 21 '13 at 9:19
add comment

I think burnination is overkill in this situation. could be used as a meta tag, but I don't think it always is used that way in practice. Seems to me that it would be valid on a question like

I need to implement a solution for the ISO-2410593813513 spec, which says that all bars must be fooed when baz is not null. I'm running into cases where baz is null, and the spec doesn't address that. What do I do now?

In other words, it's a meta tag if you use it to mean "this question is ambiguous," but it's okay if you're asking about ambiguity elsewhere.

If you want to make the claim that people are using the tag improperly, then okay, but burnination isn't the solution to that problem.

share|improve this answer
6  
It's hard to see how [ambiguity] could stand on it's own as a question categorization, or whether anyone would actually follow such a tag. –  Robert Harvey Mar 20 '13 at 15:07
1  
Actually your example question is better tagged as Undefined specification. That would pun-intended give better clarity to the categorization of your question than ambiguity. –  Lee Louviere Mar 20 '13 at 15:52
add comment

Can't think of any case where there's not a better tag.

In the case of understanding specifications. Undefined specification.

In the case of method declarations. Compiler error

In the case of code being ambiguous, no tag is necessary, there should already be existing tags.

So, I can't find a case where another tag would make the Ambiguity tag less Ambiguous (lololol).

I think this is a case of people wanting to add search terms to the question to pick up more hits, when tags are really meant for categorization, not searching. The difference being that search terms could get way more precise than categorizations, to the point that they're not useful for the purpose of following the tag. It's better to put these things into the title instead.

For example:

  • Wrong: What does this C# code do?
  • Right: Ambiguous code attempting network connection.

Even so, I can't think of someone including "Ambiguity" in their search.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .