What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 130 Stack Exchange communities.
  • Do you still talk to people normally?
  • Do you plan to donate all after you're gone?
  • What are some common pitfalls that a normal user has before achieving such status?
share|improve this question
10  
It's rather uneventful, to be honest. –  Anna Lear Apr 3 '13 at 2:00
16  
It's just like having 9,999 reputation, except you can delete stuff –  LittleBobbyTables Apr 3 '13 at 2:03
3  
I may have garnered a lot of rep, but it hasn't changed me. I still work, for example. –  Anthony Pegram Apr 3 '13 at 2:03
    
I'm loving the answers.. you all that are more close to the grand master of SO, i heard that actually is a squad of midget ninjas in a dungeon somewhere in the middle east that actually answers all the questions.. does that holds?? –  Mikael Blomkvist Apr 3 '13 at 2:08
3  
@MikaelBlomkvist WHO TOLD YOU THAT. Now we have to relocate. :( –  Anna Lear Apr 3 '13 at 2:10
2  
Common pitfall? Thinking that when you reach 20K then maybe you'll finally feel differently :) –  ɹǝʞɐʇıɥʍ ʍǝɹpuɐ Apr 3 '13 at 2:10
    
@AnnaLear I've made a question related to that in the midget.overflow site once and it was immediately closed, things started to tick.. –  Mikael Blomkvist Apr 3 '13 at 2:17
3  
The best thing about getting to 10K is the cake –  Lix Apr 3 '13 at 5:03
3  
@Lix The cake is a lie. (PS: Did you marry the girl yet?) –  Cody Gray Apr 3 '13 at 5:05
    
@cod - haha... Not yet... :-P –  Lix Apr 3 '13 at 5:10
1  
@Lix That's great! I had to make my own cake. ;-p –  Mr.Wizard Apr 3 '13 at 7:07

5 Answers 5

10K was a small personal achievement; just an arbitrary number and goal that felt good to meet.

So let me put a twist on the question: How have I changed by spending enough time on SO to garner 10K rep?

  • I have learned to triple-check my work.
  • I've learned—though I may not always succeed—to write unambiguously to avoid confusion.
  • I've learned to keep my mouth shut when I don't have the complete answer (instead, I may post a comment). In other words, if I can't bring a great answer to the table, I refrain.
  • I've learned to love and to read specifications like never before.
  • I've been exposed to theories and practices which I had no idea even existed. Part of this comes from reviewing and editing questions (before and after 10K).
  • My answers are simply better (based on the above criteria) now than when I first joined SO.

After hitting 20K a few weeks ago, I decided that I should become more actively involved in meta. And here I am...

share|improve this answer
7  
This answer both speaks to my experience and makes me unaccountably happy. –  Michael Petrotta Apr 3 '13 at 2:18
    
I think the best part about hitting 10k was just sitting around and watching the residual 12k+ rep that I've just slowly gotten since then. –  Tyler Carter Apr 3 '13 at 2:39
    
@Chacha102: I don't know you, but it looks like it's been a while since you last posted here. –  BoltClock's a Unicorn Apr 3 '13 at 6:31
1  
This. Not just specifications though; documentation as well. –  ben is uǝq backwards Apr 3 '13 at 7:28

I remember my reaction on Superuser when I hit 10K...

Someone else was like "Congratulations" and I was all "Wait, WHAT?". Then I hit 20K and realised there were no more worlds to conquer no more privileges to be gained ...

I'm close to 50K now. Rep is really just a number, and it has not really changed the way I view other users. The stuff I've learned and the people I meet are far more valuable than reputation to me - the communities around the sites I am on matter more to me than reputation.

One change I've taken to since hitting 40K is giving away bounties for questions (maybe 50-100 rep a month, give or take), now that I don't need to worry about privileges.

Comparing it to the other two sites I'm active on, where I have under 3K rep as things are, I do kinda miss the tools available for me to clean things up. Flagging is just inefficient.

Copying Tim Medora's spin on the question I found that there are a few small things that helped me get there.

1 Answer a question a day, at least

Assume you get an upvote for each question. In a year, you hit 3650 rep. You're obviously going to get more than that. This is the secret to really getting lots of rep and not spending hours on the site. If you don't do anything else do this

2 Have fun

The questions you find interesting, others might as well. Some of my most highly voted answers were things I am interested in myself. Post good, clear answers which answer the question, and reflect what you think about them. This question, now CWified was an epic example of a lot of people solving the problem and having fun

3 clarity is king

If it was simple, people wouldn't be asking. While it isn't as useful on SO, on SU I often post screenshots to help illustrate an answer. I also format things for readability first.

4 Quality is the Emperor!

Post good answers. Improve your answers as you learn more.

5 Be Altruistic

I improve answers I would have posted myself by the same things I'd do. Adding screenshots is one example. This means better answers, and the chance someone notices you do these things.

6 Don't be the fastest gun in the west, find someone who's a bad shot, and shoot better than him

This is sneaky. I get annoyed by bad answers, so I post better answers. It's entirely incidental that this makes your answer look even better and get upvotes.

share|improve this answer
3  
+1 for number 6. –  ɥʇǝS Apr 3 '13 at 4:48

You assume we talked to people normally in the first place.

I think 10k is a fairly low bar. IMO it's 100-200k that's a real differentiator: The rest of us are just here, doing what we can and/or have actual time for.

That said, I've found that my modest 65k gives people the (largely mistaken) notion that I actually Know What I'm Talking About, leading to general hilarity when the truth is revealed.

I get random emails and tweets from people asking questions. There are surprisingly few people showering me with money for time spent. I have gotten a few legitimate work inquiries, and it has made a difference in my job search.

Honestly, I've found my motivation has decreased somewhat, although that's partially due to just not having time. I'm also in generally low-volume groups meaning that even on a good day it an be a bit of a struggle to get my goal 200 rep so I can earn a Legendary badge, one that I'd actually like.

(My Generalist badge, one I actually cared about, appears to be the result of a glitch.)

So now I'm at the point of not having any more rep-based super-powers goals, running out of badges I care about earning, and the rep milestones I now see as "interesting" will be a long time coming. I now take the long view: I still enjoy answering questions, but it's a rare occasion I have the time to keep up with my earlier ambitions, and 100k+ is a long way off.

share|improve this answer
    
Even with 30k I get emails asking for help. So possibly the bar lies lower. –  Toon Krijthe Apr 3 '13 at 6:36
1  
+1 for "That said, I've found that my modest 65k gives people the (largely mistaken) notion that I actually Know What I'm Talking About, leading to general hilarity when the truth is revealed." –  Mr.Wizard Apr 3 '13 at 6:49

To speak for myself, my focus shifted from answering questions to performing more maintenance oriented tasks.

An annoying side effect of having 10k/20k on one site, is that you are going to miss the privileges on the other sites. But that is another incentive to provide lots of quality posts.

share|improve this answer
2  
"An annoying side effect of having 10k/20k on one site" so totally true. –  Journeyman Geek Apr 3 '13 at 7:12

Personally, there was a moment of "cool, I made it to 10,000 points!" followed rather soon by the realization that there is an awful lot of trash (deleted posts) on the site. This question soon followed:

Hide deleted answers with certain characteristics

Then I came to terms with deleted answers and accepted the responsibility of it (review) rather than worrying about the "pretty" site I was used to before. In fact I became a community-elected moderator for Mathematica and deal with these things all the more. :-)

I take the second point as jest, but as a matter of fact I have recently started giving points away.

One pitfall is equating "reputation" with actual knowledge. Dave Newton stated this in his answer most humorously. It goes both ways; as a new user you may think that the 10k users must know a lot but that's really not the case. As a high-rep user (not by StackOverflow standards but good for my site) I have to accept the self-deprecation of regularly reminding people that I'm not the most knowledgeable or skilled guy on the site (far from it).

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .